meganbmoore (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
meganbmoore) wrote2008-02-06 06:45 pm
meganbmoore) wrote2008-02-06 06:45 pm
Entry tags:
You, Sir and Madame, are not romantic
From crumpeteer, 10 romantic movies that really arent.
Half (or so) I haven't seen. Two I have and had issues with myself. The others I remember liking when I saw them long ago, but suspect I'd have problems with now.
crumpeteer, 10 romantic movies that really arent.Half (or so) I haven't seen. Two I have and had issues with myself. The others I remember liking when I saw them long ago, but suspect I'd have problems with now.
no subject
In the drama, he's also OCD...well, more like borderline OCD...not nearly as extreme as most fictional cases. It makes him almost impossible to live with and difficult the bear. They do a good job of showing that she honestly is probably the only person who could ever stand to live with him because he's so difficult, but it never comes across as her having to settle for him or give up who he is. She's still the one who has to accept more and be willing to bend more, but it's because he just can't change, even if he tries, rather than being unpleasant and obnoxious. The point is that he does try. And it's also very much that she chooses to accept him, flaws and all, not just that she can't do better, like in the movie.
Granted, an 11(I think...they range from 10-12) episode series has a lot more time to develop the character and relationship and to show his good side, but you could see the improvement right away. I admit to being very, very biased, though, as the male lead, Abe Hiroshi, is my favorite drama actor.
no subject
The lack of chemistry didn't help any, either. As a platonic romance, she seemed to click better with the gay artist neighbor, who actually seemed likeable.
Bleah. I didn't even like the DOG in that waste of celluloid.
Bias is understandable -- Abe Hiroshi is about eleventy-squillion times cuter than Nicholson.
no subject
Abe Hiroshi is also a ton more charming and charismatic than Nicholson. Nicholson seems to largely get by by saying cranky and unpleasant and saying that it means charisma...Abe Hiroshi is more sheer presence with awkward charm underneath.
A completely different topic, but I'm reminded of this from another convo: Have you read George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" books? One of the core families, the Starks, have six children, all of whom have a pet wolf from the same litter. When the father found them, he saw there were 5 normal wolves, and one white runt. He had 5 children with his wife and one illegitimate son, and there were 4 male wolfs and 2 female, just like his children. He decided that the wolves had been sent to him by the old gods for his children. As the series continues, he seems to be more and more correct. The illegitimate son and his wolf now live in a land of ice, and are often mistaken for a warrior and ghost, and are almost indisinguishable from each other. One child is crippled, and the wolf serves as his legs. One wolf is killed, and that child has been lost and adrift ever since, with no mooring...except a man referred to as "The Hound." Another child was separated from her wolf, which has supposedly become wild and savage. The more the rumors about the giant, mad wolf spread, the more we see her become more and more savage and ruthless.
(Now watch you already be reading the series, or not like it and then me quietly head for a corner.)
Though, it wasn't the book I was trying to remember last night...
ETA: BTW, what have you seen Abe Hiroshi in?
no subject
Nope...that came out after increasing genre-crankiness had left me drifting away from modern epic fantasy. I've had a few folks rec it to me, but these were mostly the same people who also raved uncritically about stuff I loathed like Eddings and Brooks, so that was...not a big selling point. But I did flip through an anthology that included "The Hedge Knight" a few years ago and the prose didn't cause me pain, so that's a very good sign. Perhaps this is something else to add to the BookMooch list.
And now I'm really curious about the one you still can't remember. Was it the Sarah Monette/Elizabeth Bear wolves-and-Vikings thing?
what have you seen Abe Hiroshi in?
Um...don't laugh...Godzilla 2000. I have a not-too-secret weakness for kaiju.
no subject
GRRM is a whole other thing, though. It's the only one of the huge, epic, bestselling, everyone praises high fantasy epics that I really like. I'd actually be curious about your reactions to it. Most people seem to be all about the plotters and betrayors and schemers, whereas I find the Starks(the wolf family) the most interesting. Even though it causes them more harm than good, and often seems foolish, they try to cling to a strict moral code and humanity that their world has no place for, and try(not always successfully) to keep from being crushed by it.
I have a feeling the book was something I saw at the bookstore the other day that sounded like something you'd like and I'd planned to ask if you'd read it, but forgot to write it down.
I am curious about the Bear/Monette books, now though.
As far as Godzilla 2000...I now believe you should watch his Taitei no Ken, which is pure, anachronistic, samurai shonen crack as a live action movie.
no subject
Totally. There is a ton of once-beloved YA genre fluff that I'm just as fearful to pick up again, now that I'm very critical and jaded; I'd rather just leave them as vague, happy memories.
All the recs for stuff like Brooks and Eddings wouldn't have bugged me so much if they hadn't been so uncritical. If those friends had been more like "well, the prose is a little clunky and the plot is a bit derivative, but I really like these characters" I would have had more realistic expectations when I picked them up. But it was more in the vein of gushy "oh, it's the coolest thing since Tolkien!" and...no, just not even close. I got burned a few times like that following their recs, since we *did* have a bunch of favorite books in common and some of their recs (mostly SF) did click with me, but I eventually figured out that in epic fantasy in particular, our tastes just Did Not Synch very well. I'm really just insanely hypercritical and anything that whiffs even slightly of being too derivative or genre-cliched, or some prose styles that I could forgive in other genres, put me right out of the groove in high fantasy. Maybe back when I was reading fantasy more voraciously I could have enjoyed those, but not anymore.
I have a feeling the book was something I saw at the bookstore the other day that sounded like something you'd like and I'd planned to ask if you'd read it, but forgot to write it down.
Was it F/SF? If it was, and something published in the last 15-20 years or so, the answer is "probably not". If it was something more on the horror/paranormal side of the fence, odds are slightly better.
I am curious about the Bear/Monette books, now though.
It's a one-shot, A Companion To Wolves, published late last year. I haven't read it yet, but it sounds like it's very, very much my sort of thing. Here's a bit from
It's like the sex and mud and beard lice in A Companion to Wolves. No sex, no beard lice, no book. Because part of what that book is about is an argument with the tendency, in certain tendrils of the fantasy genre, to kind of sweep anything vaguely unpleasant under the rug. The Inciting Incident, of course, was the infamous semi-elided dragon-mediated rapes and less-infamous extremely-elided institutional homosexuality in the early Pern novels. But then the book takes on a life of its own, and the worldbuilding does too, and if you pull out that one thread (i.e., isn't a bit icky that dragonriders are making off with teenaged boys, some of whom are going to wind up bonding to green dragons, and we all know what those green dragons are like, and wouldn't it be interesting to tackle those social issues head-on rather than eliding them) then the whole structure of the book collapses. And you essentially have a fuzzy wish fulfillment fantasy about a boy and his wolf fighting trolls and obtaining an understanding of the world, and the world really doesn't need another one of those.
And yet, I know perfectly well that if that book goes to press, there's going to be a faction of readers who are like "oo, icky, the sex totally ruins this nice YA novel!" (nevermind the beheadings: beheadings, okay to many people's perception of YA) (no, it's not a YA novel, put down the axe--but some people think any book with a teenaged protagonist must be YA) and there are going to be readers who are like "there's all this sex, and it's not erotic at all, what's with that?" and then, Goddess willing, there will be a faction of readers who are like "Whoa! Genderfuck! And an honest appraisal of the difficulties in living your life while dealing with a physical response to the biological rhythms of another species! And negotiation and compromise and people making sacrifices to defend their families! And the psychic cost of war! And dude, pitched battles in Lovecraftian troll-tunnels, and beheadings, and beard lice, and GIANT PSYCHIC DIRE WOLVES! How cool is that?!"
And it's that last guy I'm aiming for. Dead between his eyes. Because there are books for the other two already, and they don't need my book.
no subject
That book may have actually been it, come to think of it. I'd say "I have to go back and find out" but I already left there with a bag and a half of books this week anyway...
Terry Brooks clicked with me almost solely for a character: Wren Ohmsford. While all her male cousins were scampering around and angsting over romance and everything else and getting locked in jail and such, Wren was literally fighting her way through hell on earth, becoming queen, then fighting her way right back through that same hell with the entire elven race literally in her hand, so she could come back and save their butts.
Sadly, while some of his female characters were decent enough and the males were ok enough for your standard "coming of age fantasy heroes" Wren was the only one I ever cared about...and the one of that Shannara series he cared the least about. Everyone else got detailed post series lives...Wren got "she became queen...she's regarded as the best ruler ever...but I won't tell you squat about her." I was ready to give up on Brooks altogether, and then he brought in Grianne, who went from the handmaiden of the world's greatest evil to the most powerful force of good the world had ever known, and didn't waste her life beating herself up for her youth. She's so powerful that it essentially took an army of magic users to send her to hell, and the second she got there, she started tearing the place up to get out(sadly, I fear that in the end, she will be rescued by her nephew, the typical Ohmsford hero, instead of saving herself.)
GRRM is...well, I'm largely attached to it for the characters, and the moral message/life of the world, but it also does an extremely good job of making "huge and epic" actually feel huge and epic, instead of tust a thick book. He's the only one to ever cross the 750 page line without me wanting to tell him to shut up and get on with it.
no subject
Here's the cover art for ACTW, does that look familiar?
GRRM is...well, I'm largely attached to it for the characters, and the moral message/life of the world, but it also does an extremely good job of making "huge and epic" actually feel huge and epic, instead of tust a thick book.
That is another excellent selling point in its favor. I have no problem with loooooong books when the length is necessary to tell the story properly, but I hate hate hate books that just seem to be full of unnecessary padding to the point where a proper editor would have to trade the red pencil for a chainsaw.
no subject
The GRRM books are, for lack of a better way to explain it, several epic fantasy storylines playing out all at once in one huge landscape...you have the unwanted son struggling through corrupt court, the illegitimate young man struggling to find his place and becoming a leader, the boy leading a rebellion after the murder of his father, the "villainous" man finding redemption, the noble girl forced into the wild after being separated from her family and birthright and growing up on the streets, determined to have her revenge, the exiled princess returning to reclaim her birthright, and the girly-prissy girl who has to grow up and nevigate an enemy court. All these plotlines (and others) can be the core plot of any epic fantasy, but they're all taking place in one world, at one time, over the same kigdom.
no subject
And samurai crack sounds like fun. I still need to watch Damo and a bunch of other things, but before I start scavenging for downloads and rentals I need to poke more closely at some of the local cable channels and see which of the dramas they're running are subtitled (the listings are remarkably unhelpful so the only way to find out for sure is to tune in). I get a couple of Asian networks, primarily Korean-focused given the area demographics but there's one that runs a handful of Japanese series; I just noticed last night that this station's running the old TV version of Zatoichi so I'm going to be going on a major old-school Katsu-binge soon.
no subject