ext_2459 ([identity profile] laura-holt-pi.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] meganbmoore 2008-07-31 06:25 am (UTC)

By 1000 AD, these views were seen as old-fashioned.

He sounds like a man who is gay, but in denial. A lot of them are the most homophobic people around and it's clear he has no feelings towards women except a fear that, if they are not controlled, they may be dangerous.

Whatever his own leanings, everything he says screams sexual and social inadequate.

I looked at one of his books once, but the first paragraph failed to grip me, so I didn't read it. I'm so glad now that I didn't.

I'm rather old-fashioned myself. I consider marriage to be between a man and a woman, but support the rights of gays and lesbians to have civil partnerships, joinings or whatever else they want to call them. John Barrowman chooses not to call his relationship a marriage because he agrees that marriage is a male/female thing.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting