meganbmoore (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
meganbmoore) wrote2008-07-08 07:06 pm
meganbmoore) wrote2008-07-08 07:06 pm
Entry tags:
The Wizard Hunters by Martha Wells
Set around 30 years after The Death of the Necromancer, The Wizard Hunters begins with our heroine, Tremaine Valiarde, trying to think of a way to kill herself. But she can’t just die any way, it has to look like an accident. Being raised by an emotionally distant (I believe Tremaine refers to him as “emotionally dead” at one point) master criminal and an opium addicted mage apparently has an interesting affect on people.
The plot of this is almost a straight pulp adventure retold as fantasy. In an Ile-Rien that resembles 1920s-30s Europe, Tremaine, the daughter of the anti-heroes of DotN is a playwright who seems ill-suited to be the heir to such adventurous (and amoral) people, and is something of a flighty (and rich) playwright. Even though she has no magic herself, she does have a sphere that seems to have magical powers, and which eventually causes Tremaine and her friends to be transported to another world, which they soon learn is the home of the Gardier, a force that is invading Ile-Rien. There, Tremaine begins to suspect that her father, Nicholas, and uncle, Arisilde, may not actually be dead.
The plot can be repetitive-people are regularly being captured and rescued, and then off to rescue someone else-but that’s fairly fitting for the pulp adventures it seems to be loosely based on, and Tremaine herself is great fun. In theory, I really like characters who come from adventurous, sometimes notorious, families, but who aren’t cut from the same cloth and don’t really want that life for themselves, but often the character comes off as whiny, and you don’t get why they don’t appreciate their family more. Thankfully, that isn’t the case with Tremaine, who fluctuates between the nice, flighty artist and the ruthless adventurer with a morbid sense of humor. I mean, really, who would want to grow up to be Nicholas? For that matter, who can blame someone who was raised by Nicholas for growing up to be a bit batty? The man probably arranged for bad things to happen to boys who pulled her hair when she was five. Tremaine’s friends are also quite fun. I’m especially fond of Ilias. Granted, he’s not much more than Tremaine’s muscle so far, but he’s her very effective muscle who lets her know when she’s starting to get a little too caught up in the whole adventuring thing.
I find that I like the memory of Nicholas as the vengeful husband and over-protective father more than I like Nicholas himself. If it makes sense, I probably would have liked him more if I’d read DotN after the Fall of Ile-Rien trilogy, but I probably would have been lost here without it.
The plot of this is almost a straight pulp adventure retold as fantasy. In an Ile-Rien that resembles 1920s-30s Europe, Tremaine, the daughter of the anti-heroes of DotN is a playwright who seems ill-suited to be the heir to such adventurous (and amoral) people, and is something of a flighty (and rich) playwright. Even though she has no magic herself, she does have a sphere that seems to have magical powers, and which eventually causes Tremaine and her friends to be transported to another world, which they soon learn is the home of the Gardier, a force that is invading Ile-Rien. There, Tremaine begins to suspect that her father, Nicholas, and uncle, Arisilde, may not actually be dead.
The plot can be repetitive-people are regularly being captured and rescued, and then off to rescue someone else-but that’s fairly fitting for the pulp adventures it seems to be loosely based on, and Tremaine herself is great fun. In theory, I really like characters who come from adventurous, sometimes notorious, families, but who aren’t cut from the same cloth and don’t really want that life for themselves, but often the character comes off as whiny, and you don’t get why they don’t appreciate their family more. Thankfully, that isn’t the case with Tremaine, who fluctuates between the nice, flighty artist and the ruthless adventurer with a morbid sense of humor. I mean, really, who would want to grow up to be Nicholas? For that matter, who can blame someone who was raised by Nicholas for growing up to be a bit batty? The man probably arranged for bad things to happen to boys who pulled her hair when she was five. Tremaine’s friends are also quite fun. I’m especially fond of Ilias. Granted, he’s not much more than Tremaine’s muscle so far, but he’s her very effective muscle who lets her know when she’s starting to get a little too caught up in the whole adventuring thing.
I find that I like the memory of Nicholas as the vengeful husband and over-protective father more than I like Nicholas himself. If it makes sense, I probably would have liked him more if I’d read DotN after the Fall of Ile-Rien trilogy, but I probably would have been lost here without it.
no subject
What, Ilias' tormented background wasn't angsty enough for you? And how about his brotherly relationship with Giliead? (Not to mention the immortal line about Ixion: "Ixion alive had been bad enough. Ixion, dead, headless and really, really annoyed was unimaginably worse ... .") Wells really does love to bring The Snark.
I'm glad you're enjoying this! I can never understand why an author like Wells languishes unbought, while so many pieces of crap - or at best, plastic - sell like hot cakes and get good reviews. (Stand by - if I can make myself finish reading it - for a prime example ... .)
no subject
No idea who Stand is by, or what it is...
no subject
Ooops, that wasn't meant to be a title. It was an order, so to speak - "Just hang in there, and eventually I'll fill you in on this book, which is a great example of what I mean." The book in question is The Lies of Locke Lamora, but I was trying to be cagey - clearly a big mistake.
I didn't think that Ilias' backstory was any kind of record-breaker for angst, but I liked it, and it gives him (and Giliead) more character.
In puzzling over the book's relative lack of popularity, I find myself wondering whether people just don't find Tremaine sympathetic enough because she's so down-to-earth about her problems - "Hey, I can't stand my life, so I'm going to do something about it, but I gotta make sure it doesn't backfire on anyone else" - rather than angsting on about them.
no subject
Wells's book tend to be kind of an odd mishmash of things. The Ile-Rien books tend to be clear send ups to certain storytypes-Element of Fire is a swashbuckler, Death of the Necromancer a gothic revenge, and Wizard Hunters 1930s pulpy adventure-but then take them out of their normal elements and add magic and technology that's out of place to the story normally. For me, it's why I like them, so far, and helps with the sometimes convoluted and rambly plots, but I think the odd combinations are offputting for some.
no subject
So, I think you have a damn good point about people not realizing how awesome she is.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I may have to steal the icon, if I may.
no subject
no subject
I really liked Locke Lamora as well, for what it's worth - but don't have much of an interest in reading the next book in the series.
no subject
The thing about Locke Lamora is that, when you finish, you just don't see what the point of a sequel would be.
no subject
no subject
Sometimes, I think, authors tend to get attached to a character and not realize they need to just leave them be after their one send off, or make them too prominent so that they start taking over the story(see: lots of shounen manga) or are blind to their faults (see: ERAGON.)
While I don't really object to reading more about Locke and Jean, I'd rather read more about the city than them in another place.
no subject
But I adore Tremaine, and how even though she's neither a mage nor a warrior, she is clearly in control.
no subject
*currently finishing up the 3rd*
no subject
no subject