meganbmoore (
meganbmoore) wrote2008-10-06 09:39 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
fannish types
Here is an interesting post on two Intellectual and Emotional fans and approaches to fandom and fiction. (Though I think "Analytical" is much more fitting than "Intellectual." I think it represents the responses and comments better, and that most would be more willing to label themselves as such.)
See also: Why Megan hates or is "meh" about many popular things.
I don't think it's quite as strict a divide as it comes across in the post (but then, I don't think the OP intends for it to be a strict divide) but I think most of what it says is pretty spot on.
For example, I hate the standard kdrama trope of the Cinderella story where the poor girl and/or her family is saved by the rich guy, who treats her badly throughout the series, but it's ok, because he's angsty and he loves her, so he can treat her badly as long as she gets the cute guy and a better financial/social position.* Most, however, don't seem to be bothered by "male angst justifies bad treatment of female," especially with the "gets guy" addendum, (this applies to a lot of romantic fiction) or even see it as such, and just want the angsty love story. Approaching fiction for and like that isn't "wrong" or "bad," but is obviously the opposite of how I read it, as very different things are wanted from it. On the flipside, when you add in his selling himself as a child so she can have an operation to save her life to the trope, I turn amazingly forgiving. (It also helps that his adoptive mother is so mentally fragile that for once I can understand the whole "push away for greater good" thing.
*My Girl is the only one I've seen with this Cinderella trope where I never thought he treated her badly or was a jerk. Lovers and 1% of Anything dance around the trope a bit, but ultimately they're pretty much on the same social standing, and the only time either heroine needs to be "saved" is when the guy caused the situation in one way or another, so she's never in his debt so that his actions are excused by that.
See also: Why Megan hates or is "meh" about many popular things.
I don't think it's quite as strict a divide as it comes across in the post (but then, I don't think the OP intends for it to be a strict divide) but I think most of what it says is pretty spot on.
For example, I hate the standard kdrama trope of the Cinderella story where the poor girl and/or her family is saved by the rich guy, who treats her badly throughout the series, but it's ok, because he's angsty and he loves her, so he can treat her badly as long as she gets the cute guy and a better financial/social position.* Most, however, don't seem to be bothered by "male angst justifies bad treatment of female," especially with the "gets guy" addendum, (this applies to a lot of romantic fiction) or even see it as such, and just want the angsty love story. Approaching fiction for and like that isn't "wrong" or "bad," but is obviously the opposite of how I read it, as very different things are wanted from it. On the flipside, when you add in his selling himself as a child so she can have an operation to save her life to the trope, I turn amazingly forgiving. (It also helps that his adoptive mother is so mentally fragile that for once I can understand the whole "push away for greater good" thing.
*My Girl is the only one I've seen with this Cinderella trope where I never thought he treated her badly or was a jerk. Lovers and 1% of Anything dance around the trope a bit, but ultimately they're pretty much on the same social standing, and the only time either heroine needs to be "saved" is when the guy caused the situation in one way or another, so she's never in his debt so that his actions are excused by that.
no subject
In TnK, I think the text did a good enough job of portraying him as a creep and wrongwrongwrong that, while I wanted to punch him a lot and OMG GET OUT OF THESE NICE PEOPLE'S LIVES!!, it wasn't to the point of not being able to watch. But enough that a story with a similar root was not what I needed.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There are some non-romance contemporary ones, but they aren't the norm, and are pretty much hidden behind the rest. And some of the romance ones aren't like that. It's just that more of them are, and they're the ones that tend to be most popular. I think it's that they cater to the lowest common denominator, and so are easy to get into. It's also, I find, easier to talk endlessly about less complex things, including finding ways for them to be complex, when they really aren't. Really complex things tend to be difficult to pin down and explain, but something simple with a bit of "this is complex" coding over it is easier fodder.
BTW, I was looking at your Hwang Jin Yi posts earlier. It isn't really mentioned in the drama, but the guy who played her bodyguard is, historically, the one who loved her his whole life and always supported and took care of her (I think the bodyguard bit is more popular fiction than history, but he was an official of some sort), even though he wasn't her "great love," and they were together until he died.
no subject
Oh, is that what it was. I was kind of confused by his purpose in the drama.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
BTW, I hope you don't mind, but I friended you.
no subject
Oh, I don't mind. As I say in my userinfo, I feel no one needs permission to friend me.