meganbmoore: (archer)
meganbmoore ([personal profile] meganbmoore) wrote2008-12-01 12:52 pm
Entry tags:

Robin Hood: Season 1, eps 1-5 (current BBC series)

Robin, Earl of Huntington, returns home after 5 years in the crusades to find the evil Sheriff of Nottingham overtaxing his people. Robin becomes the leader of a band of outlaws and tries to woo his childhood love, Marian with his new outlaw status. Or something.

You know the drill.

I’ll state this up front: I don’t like Robin. I think he’s a smug gloryhound and don’t like the way he talks down to Marian. He’s also supposed to be smart, but it comes across as utterly ridiculous when they do that. There’s also his whole “no killing ever” policy. Now, sometimes I like it when characters take that stance. It can be very interesting and provide for good character studies but here it’s ridiculous. I could understand it at first, but by the time the sheriff was cutting off tongues, he should have realized that that stance wouldn’t work. It’s supposed to make him seem noble and heroic, but makes him seem like an idiot.

Let me put this in superhero terms. Between Robin’s acrobatics and the flashes of light to let us know how awesome an archer he is, they’re pretty much writing Robin as a superhero anyway. Robin is Captain America. The Sheriff is his archenemy, Red Skull. Guisbourne is Red Skull’s henchman, Crossbones. When Captain America catches Crossbones robbing a bank and shooting everyone inside, he takes him down and turns him over to the police. It isn’t a permanent solution, but it’s a justice system he has faith in, and he knows there will be legal consequences for Crossbones. In Robin Hood’s case, however, Captain America is giving Crossbones back to Red Skull, knowing perfectly well that there will be no punishment and that Red Skull will send Crossbones to rob another bank the next day. It would be different if Robin didn’t have the opportunity to take care of them permanently, but he does. Constantly. And it’s regularly brought up that he doesn’t to make sure we realize how he’s so noble, and emotionally scarred from the crusades, because doesn’t it make him so much more interesting that way?

I think the actor could be charming and likable, but the script makes Robin act superior, and be way too eager for attention for his likability to really come through for me.

However, I like Robin’s men. Much is an idiot, but supposed to be one. I like the quiet Will (though I keep forgetting that he actually can talk) and how Alan is pretty much a conman, and John as the gruff father figure. I absolutely adore the sheriff as a villain. He’s an absurd scenery-chewer and the actor knows it. I am firmly convinced that the only reason Robin has lasted five minutes again him is because if that happens, the show will end. I love Richard Armitage and think the black leather is quite fetching, but Guisbourne isn’t doing a lot for me. I think some spoilers I know for season 2 are a part of that, though.

As an idea, I am utterly in love with Marian. A heroine who is cold and pragmatic, who thinks idealism and heroism are foolish, and who has to be won over to the idea? A lot of her lines are lifted word-for-word from the Jaded and Battle-Scarred Warrior Handbook, and I love it. There’s also the whole Night Watchman business. It clashes a bit with her stated attitudes on heroism and vigilantes, but it also fits, because she isn’t flashy about it and helps people without directly crossing the sheriff most of the time. While the villagers knew about her, she was low key enough that she didn’t make waves, so people weren’t getting their tongues cut out over it. For some reason, though, she isn’t quite clicking with me. I like her ok, and the actress does a good job, but I look at the elements of the character, and I should be madly in love, but I’m not. I think that part of it is that they’re trying a bit hard with the “feminist heroine” bit in that it is a modern take on it, but I think it’s also because they’re really pushing Robin/Marian very hard, and Robin makes it very difficult for me to buy into that pairing. Considering what a big part of the legend Robin/Marian is, that’s not really a good thing.

D’Jaq only appeared in the last episode I watched. I suspect I’ll like her, but I’m a bit leery of the apparent “tomboy and healer” take on the character. I’m also surprised Will clued the others in on her being a girl so quickly.

The show is enjoyable in a campy way, though you really have to ignore most of the costumes and attitudes. Really, I kind of wish it’d stop trying to be serious, and just be fun. I don’t think it’ll ever be a favorite, but I find it entertaining.

[identity profile] mscongeniality.livejournal.com 2008-12-01 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah...I watch Robin Hood purely for the crack. And Djaq. And Richard Armitage.

Let me know once you get past the first couple of episodes of the second season. I've got an awesome fic to rec. ;-)

[identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com 2008-12-01 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd like it a lot more if I could ignore Robin. Jonas Armstrong is pretty, but that doesn't make up for Robin. Though I do get a kick out of the flashes of light when he fires. Though I'm fairly certain that it isn't supposed to make me laugh maniacally.

I should get the rest of season 1 sometime this week, then I'll likely watch a couple things before season 2.
havocthecat: the lady of shalott (Default)

[personal profile] havocthecat 2008-12-01 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're not spoiled for season two, you might want to be. It ruined any chance I had of wanting to watch the entire series.

[identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com 2008-12-01 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The end of the season? Yes, I am. But comments about Marian and D'Jaq made me curious enough to watch.

[identity profile] mscongeniality.livejournal.com 2008-12-01 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough, I haven't finished watching Season 2 myself. It is an awesome story, but was written for Yuletide so unless I can dig out the direct URL it's blocked until Xmas anyway. :)