Burn Notice
So, in addition to bad TV movies from the 90s, I've also spent the last couple days watching the first seven episodes of Burn Notice. That's the one about the US spy who who gets a "burn notice" cutting him off from every resource he used to have available, leaving him penniless and without resources wherever they dump him. And with watchdogs. Michael Westen ends up dumped in Miami with FBI watchdogs on his tail and what ammounts to orders not to leave, so he teams up with Sam, a retired agent living off rich girlfriends, and Fiona, his trigger happy ex-girlfriend who was also a member of the IRA, to find out why, taking on odd jobs to fix people's problems along the way. He's also originally from Miami, which means that now he can't escape his mother trying to get him to face family troubles he's been avoiding for fifteen years.
It's enjoyable enough, but I don't really have any investment or love for it. Bu I can't dislike anything that has Bruce Campbell and Gabrielle Anwar. But I have two complaints.
The first is the non-stop closeups of bikini clad women. Yes, this is Miami, and it's meant to give "atmosphere," but unless the attractive young women there outnumber the attractive young men about 200-to-1, they can just have closeups of shirtless men in shorts to balance out the fanservice.
The second is Fiona. For the record, I like her. She amuses me. Especially when she tries to sneak in a few explosions before Michael tells her to behave. And cocktail bombs.
But why is she there? In Miami, not the show. So, she went to Miami because Michael still had her listed as his contact number. But why did she stay? Didn't she have any sort of a life before that? Contacts? A job? Why did she drop everything to just hang out in Miami and chase Michael around? Where is she living? It isn't until episode 7 that we learn she's making a bit of money trafficking guns. Until then, I thought she was sitting around somewhere, twiddling her thumbs while she waited for him to call her for help. When she wasn't following him everywhere and trying to get in his pants. Every other character, we know what their deal is, why they're living in Miami, what their goal is, how they spend their time, etc. within a couple scenes. With Fiona, we don't get a hint of anything until a throwaway scene in episode seven.
And why is she so determined to get back together with Michael? I get why she came, but why did she stay, and why is she constantly throwing herself at a guy who's always rejecting her? I'm supposed to root for them, but why should I root for a man who doesn't like part of who she is and wants her to suppress her instincts, and often doesn't seem to want her around, and a woman who doesn't seem to have anything going on except for chasing after him, despite constant rejection?
Granted, I've only seen seven episodes, and there could be a major twist or development there that will make me eat my words, but so far, this seems to be a classic case "kicking butt + love interest = character." Ideally, female characters will have as much agency, plot and chance to kick butt as male characters. Ideally, female characters won't be judged as compared to male characters at all. But this is a perfect example of why I'll take a heroine who can't fight to save her life but has plot and goals over one who can kick butt but doesn't have a story or agency any day. Mind you, I'd rather have both. I just don't care for being told that I'm being given "a strong female character" (one of my least favorite phrases ever) when all I really have is "ooh, badass-just as good as the men!" I want characters who are treated as equals regardless of gender, not tokens representing a limited idea of what can make one gender "worthy" of being alongside the other.