Dec. 13th, 2013

meganbmoore: (emma: turning brains since 1816)


Longbourn is a novel that attempts to cash in on both the popularity of Jane Austen and Downton Abbey, centering the plot around Sarah, a housemaid to the Bennets in Pride and Prejudice. Which! I actually really like the idea of, and I was looking forward to it, despite having seen some grumblings about the protagonist often sounding like a modern person commenting on the lives of late 18th century servants. I mean, I love Austen, but she isn't exactly perfect, and I thought the idea had potential. Unfortunately, the book itself ended up being dull and predictable, and the omgmajorshocking plot twist that overtook a large chunk of the last 3rd of the book was blatantly obvious from the beginning..

no actual spoilers, but they're very easy to guess just from a description of the setup )
The thing is, it rarely really tries to do things with the plot, and is mostly a predictable Regency romance (albeit about servants, instead of gentlemen and ladies) that occasionally checks in with the plot of P&P. sometimes, Sarah makes comments about how Lizzy has "an obliging disposition" and that Jane was being considerate to get sick somewhere else so she wouldn't trouble her own servants. I think those bits were meant to be witty commentary, but they, and others like them, just fell flat. When it does try to do things, it's doing things that other canons have done before, sometimes the exact same thing, and not in an interesting way, much less as well as its predecessors did. If you've watched either version of Upstairs/Downstairs, Gosford Park, or Downton Abbey (any of it, despite the considerable drop in quality after season 1), you've seen everything it has to say about class, only say a lot more and say it better, and it doesn't begin to compare to Wide Sargasso Sea or The Wind Done Gone in terms of addressing the problems of a piece of classic literature. And it probably isn't fair of me to compare it to the latter two but I think it wants to be seen as the same kind of book, so I will. for that matter, for all it's problems, Lost in Austen did a better job of looking at P&P's issues, even though it had a legion of its own problems.

Technically, it isn't a bad book or anything, it just isn't a good or interesting book, either. It's being marketed along the lines of "Downton Abbey for Jane Austen fans" and i suppose if you just want Jane Austen fanfic, it's fine? But I found it to be a huge disappointment. I also don't think that people who aren't fans of Austen would get much out of it, because, well the writer is obviously a fan of the book, and the criticisms are light the few bits that come close to good deconstruction aren't until very late in the book.

Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 01:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios