Disney Channel and romantic tropes
Nov. 18th, 2008 02:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My DVD player has died and I've been compensating by watching Disney Channel shows. Do not ask. I think I've mostly thinking about how they'd be so cool if I were 12. All the supposedly charming or cool or cute guys need a ounch in the face. The goody girls who I'm supposed to like are snooty and superior, all other girls are supposed to be annoying, materialistic comedic relief, but are more entertaining. The smart boys are supposed annoying twats and the "cool" boys are annoying brats who could do with being grounded for years. I think the only character I like is the hyper competitive and academic sister in some show that's a Brady Bunch knockoff that's named after her irritating stepbrother. I despair over her taste in boys, though. (The only show whose title I know is The Suite Life of Zach and Cody. That one is entertaining, though I keep wondering why the adults haven't murdered all the kids.)
Make me stop watching them.
ANYWAY!
Over at Dear Author, they have a poll about favorite and least favorite romantic tropes. Since this is a type of topic I never tire of (people's likes and dislikes) give me some of yours.
Make me stop watching them.
ANYWAY!
Over at Dear Author, they have a poll about favorite and least favorite romantic tropes. Since this is a type of topic I never tire of (people's likes and dislikes) give me some of yours.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:43 pm (UTC)Ooh, forgot the tropes. I hate:
Marriage of Convenience
The Revenge Plot
The Big Misunderstanding
The Secret Baby
The Virgin Widow
Amnesia
Captivity Romances
The Will Made Me Do It
Blackmailed for Her/His Love
Forbidden to Love
Um, this may be why I rarely read romance novels.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:45 pm (UTC)Well, the post isn't going anywhere! You can sit and brainstorm until you have internet again!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:49 pm (UTC)I've been wondering at the sucks less/mental age thing, too, but I'm afraid to find out.
ETAs for ETA: Amnesia and Forbidden to Love can be done well, but rarely are. In or out of romance novels. Most of those other tropes should die, though. And yet, they somehow irritate me less in romance novels than elsewhere, but I tend to prefer my romance in plots where the romance isn't the main plot.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:51 pm (UTC)I didn't see that much of Phil of the Future but it was a good show.
I saw one episode of the stepbrother one, except I'm not sure I remember the title either. (Life With Derek, maybe?) It did have a higher level of acting quality than some of them.
I kind of like Hannah Montana.
In my own defense I usually only watch these when my daughter is over.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:53 pm (UTC)I have a secret weakness for The Marriage of Convenience.
I do really hate The Big Misunderstanding though. I always want to shake everyone and scream at them.
I also seem to have outgrown The Dangerous Rake And His Mysterious Appeal.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:54 pm (UTC)This, despite the fact that These Old Shades is one of my favorite Georgette Heyer novels. I hate all the other versions of that trope, okay? (Also, it is possible that I love Justin, Duke of Avon so much that I can forgive the trope at the center of the book.)
...Okay, so Venetia is another one of my favorite Heyers. That doesn't count either. Damerel isn't really wicked. He just thinks he is. Also, Venetia isn't really pure. She does actually want to host those orgies.
Do you know Heyer?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:55 pm (UTC)And you never ship anybody, so I feel totally justified now lol.
The boys...it'd be less annoying if the academic boy weren't supposed to be annoying because he's smart...
I think you're totally right-- I was always that irritating nerd and part of me resents the show for doing what it does with that idea.
I've been wondering at the sucks less/mental age thing, too, but I'm afraid to find out.
I've been playing with it by watching Disney movies, and those stand up to the test of time, so far. But the TV shows aren't quite the same caliber.
Um ETA for ETA for ETA (LJ isn't delivering comments swiftly enough!): Yeah, my main problem with those tropes is never seeing them done well. I like real plot with my romance too.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:55 pm (UTC)--I see they have something called "the big misunderstanding" there. I'm not sure exactly what that refers to, but I can guarantee you that if a romance gets dragged out because the characters are constantly misunderstanding each other in ways that would be fixed if they'd just freaking talk to each other, I'm going to want to throw something at the characters.
--Anything where one character (especially the woman, because it's usually the woman) has to adhere more to stereotypical gender traits in order to be acceptable to the other.
--Anything where one character (especially the man, because it's usually the man) "protects" the other character by preventing them from doing things.
Favorite:
--I really like when two characters have some unusual previous connection (something less typical than a childhood marriage promise, although if done well I guess I could go for that too) and this later develops into a romance.
I'm kind of headdesking over this at the moment, actually, because one of the anime I follow just resolved a romantic plotline that I'd been very interested in (read as, in fandom terms: canoned my OTP!) in such a way as to contain both least favorite and favorite tropes. AUGH.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:58 pm (UTC)Hm. I'll give the Romantic Tropes thing some thought.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:59 pm (UTC)I haven't read Heyer yet, no.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:04 pm (UTC)The thing with romance centric plots is that I'm rarely convinced they can make it through real life after they work out their personal issues. If they're having to deal with other things that aren't related to their relationship too, or the conflict isn't about getting together, i'm more comvinced. (Which is why, of my favorite shoujo series, the only one where the romance is the main focus is one where they get together quickly, and the conflict-when there is conflict- is about what they'll do with their lives after HS.)
ETA: I've been rewatching Disney mvies lately too. I think that, once you reach Little Mermaid Disney goes "hmm...our target audience is teenaged girls...let's make more of these focus of finding their place in the world, and less on being rescued by the prince" and it even carries into the male-lead centric shows.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:09 pm (UTC)The more I think about the plot, the less I understand why I adore it.
Where can the angsty immortal variation be found?
I do recommend reading Heyer; yes, her books do follow quite a number of tropes, but that's partially because she invents some of the tropes as she goes.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:13 pm (UTC)It did. It became less based in folklore, and lost a lot of the edge to its writing. Also, it's just . . . it was much more enjoyable when you had Fi, who was short and had dark brown hair and whose main talents were computers and an encyclopedic knowledge of the supernatural. And, then they replaced her with Annie, before even finishing her story. Tall, blonde, musically talented, guarded-by-a-spirit-panther Annie. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 09:14 pm (UTC)