teh hooman race, i fear for it!
Jun. 5th, 2008 11:08 pm1) What is this I hear on the radio about California apparently deciding that that "legalizing gay marriage" thing was a bad idea and trying to make a new law to counteract it? No, California, you are only supposed to try to fix bad decisions. Stop with this second guessing thing.
2) I have not been posting much on the marriage cult fallout stuff going on here, because it's being pretty well publicized. I assume most know that the supreme court did some "no-no" handslapping in regards to the children being taken from their parents, and said to give a lot of them back. Apparently, this has started. If a single underaged girl who is married, pregnant, or already has a child is given back to her parents, I lose all faith in my state.
(BTW, between these two things, overhearing random conversations around town has been very interesting the last few weeks.)
2) I have not been posting much on the marriage cult fallout stuff going on here, because it's being pretty well publicized. I assume most know that the supreme court did some "no-no" handslapping in regards to the children being taken from their parents, and said to give a lot of them back. Apparently, this has started. If a single underaged girl who is married, pregnant, or already has a child is given back to her parents, I lose all faith in my state.
(BTW, between these two things, overhearing random conversations around town has been very interesting the last few weeks.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 04:54 am (UTC)Whoa, what? I haven't heard anything about that!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 05:38 am (UTC)Anyway, the supreme court (to the disgust of the entire area...seeing pregnant 13-14 year olds being led into local buildings tends to inspire certain feelings and all...) said that they had no right to take all the kids, and they had to be returned to their parents. It gets extra murky because there have been several births since then, and several girls(they took boys, too, but no one was marrying them of to people twice their age) turned of legal age since then, and then there are the really young ones whose parents are the teenagers in question. It hasn't really(in the stuff I've caught) been made clear if all or just some kids are being returned. I'm hoping that no girls who were married/pregnant/have kids are being returned to the parents who allowed it in the first place, but I don't have much faith. (The local govt., of course, is quite displeased about this turn of events, and the people around here are very opinionated about things even before it actually has anything to do with them.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 07:04 pm (UTC)Phone calls to shelter/abuse hotlines, claiming to be from a pregnant teenage girl married to an abusive older man; it's now looking like the call was a hoax... (http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/hoax-call-triggered-police-raid/2008/04/25/1208743246487.html)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 05:04 am (UTC)And what a sucky, sucky move fore the supreme court. I cannot imagine giving children back to parents who put them in that situation in the first place.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 03:54 pm (UTC)