Chill Factor by Rachel Caine
Aug. 2nd, 2008 05:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don’t quite feel like a proper writeup of this, so just a quick rundown of some points:
1. Still no signs of the typical urban fantasy trend of revolving door love interests and constant triangles. I continue to approve of this.I am giving Lewis suspicious looks, though. Not much romance at all in this one, actually, as David was mostly off page.
2. I’m glad Jonathan is seeming to be set up more as a bastard with good points than an angsty woobie, and that he isn’t strictly portrayed as right or wrong in his actions, just as having very different priorities.
3. Lewis is finally given purpose. In the first two books, he was mostly just…there. Now he’s finally a character and we’re learning what his motives and goals are, and what he was up to. The Ma’at is an interesting idea-or at least, the ideas behind them are interesting, I’m not so sure I care for the Ma’at themselves-and has potential, though I hope the series doesn’t turn into them and the Wardens yanking Jo between them.
4. Very, very glad Rahel isn’t gone.
5. Very much not sure yet what I think of Jo’s pregnancy. On the one hand, I’m amazed a UF author was allowed to make her main character pregnant. And still have her that way at the end of the book. I have no illusions about the chances of this being a normal pregnancy resulting in diapers and 2 a.m. wakeup screams, but I’m amazed the “P” word got past the UF editors. It could interfere with the skintight leather wearing and half dozen sexy vampires and werewolves and similar Others lusting after her. Oh wait, this is about the only UF out there without that. (Me? Have issues with the most popular tropes of the genre and be suspicious of anything that resembles them? What gave you that idea?) On the other hand, from what I gather, David deliberately made Jo pregnant when djinn supposedly can’t do that, knowing that’s what she thought. It’s a little too close to a person telling their partner there’s no need for birth control because they can’t have children, when they know they can have children. (Which often comes with a “well, once we’re pregnant, s/he’ll want the baby” mindset.) I think I need to see how it plays out before I really have a solid opinion of it.
1. Still no signs of the typical urban fantasy trend of revolving door love interests and constant triangles. I continue to approve of this.
2. I’m glad Jonathan is seeming to be set up more as a bastard with good points than an angsty woobie, and that he isn’t strictly portrayed as right or wrong in his actions, just as having very different priorities.
3. Lewis is finally given purpose. In the first two books, he was mostly just…there. Now he’s finally a character and we’re learning what his motives and goals are, and what he was up to. The Ma’at is an interesting idea-or at least, the ideas behind them are interesting, I’m not so sure I care for the Ma’at themselves-and has potential, though I hope the series doesn’t turn into them and the Wardens yanking Jo between them.
4. Very, very glad Rahel isn’t gone.
5. Very much not sure yet what I think of Jo’s pregnancy. On the one hand, I’m amazed a UF author was allowed to make her main character pregnant. And still have her that way at the end of the book. I have no illusions about the chances of this being a normal pregnancy resulting in diapers and 2 a.m. wakeup screams, but I’m amazed the “P” word got past the UF editors. It could interfere with the skintight leather wearing and half dozen sexy vampires and werewolves and similar Others lusting after her. Oh wait, this is about the only UF out there without that. (Me? Have issues with the most popular tropes of the genre and be suspicious of anything that resembles them? What gave you that idea?) On the other hand, from what I gather, David deliberately made Jo pregnant when djinn supposedly can’t do that, knowing that’s what she thought. It’s a little too close to a person telling their partner there’s no need for birth control because they can’t have children, when they know they can have children. (Which often comes with a “well, once we’re pregnant, s/he’ll want the baby” mindset.) I think I need to see how it plays out before I really have a solid opinion of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 06:26 pm (UTC)Speaking of, what did you think of it? I hated it, because I felt like there were no hints in prior books, and that that was the kind of thing that should have been hinted at earlier. Plus, I get so, so fucking sick of the strong women who was raped in her past trope.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 07:06 pm (UTC)I'm sick and tired of the trope myself (put down a book yesterday the second I saw it had the trope as a main motivating factor) but I think this was a better handling of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 08:35 pm (UTC)Yes. It's automatically assumed in fiction that any female who doesn't sit at home baking cookies will, at somepoint in time, face attempted rape. And sitting home and baking cookies isn't safe, either, because some enemy may want to give your boyfriend extra angst.
The few years after I started reading fantasy, most of my fantasy reading was from the school library, and I managed to avoid books like that at the bookstore somehow (though, as this was age 12-16~, I most likely missed some stuff in the books.) But then I started going to the public library and used bookstores and it ws in almost every book I read. Actually, I think I stopped reading it for about a year or so after that.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 09:34 pm (UTC)I've only read the first so far, but it's interesting because it's from Tiger's perspective, and he's a sexist moron, so I wanted to strangle him a lot, but it seems to be written that way to emphasize how all the guys of the time (in fantasy novels) were like that.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 09:48 pm (UTC)It's not quite as subversive as the author intended, I think.