random fandom meme
Feb. 2nd, 2009 10:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. Comment in this post with a pairing, a character, or theory.
2. I shall write you back a paragraph explaining what I think about it (good, bad, indifferent) and why.
3. Repost in your own journal if you want.
2. I shall write you back a paragraph explaining what I think about it (good, bad, indifferent) and why.
3. Repost in your own journal if you want.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:42 am (UTC)I am, however, positive that the Mokonas will live.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:45 am (UTC)Any thoughts on why? /picks your brain
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:49 am (UTC)Unless Yuuko has INTERESTING secrets (about herself or someone else) though, I don't think that's the case.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:46 am (UTC)Though it makes sense, I suppose. I'm sure a lot of it is based on their having similar coloring, but I can see the argument beyond that: Raven kidnaps Drosselmeier's granddaughter for his own reasons, slightly similar dispositions, similar obsessions, etc. I don't know that I'd get behind it, but I guess can see where the theory is coming from.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:58 am (UTC)The names are illegible. That said, Autor is pointing at Fakir's name, which is circled. Take a look at the crossed-out blur to the left of Fakir's name. It's about half the length of Fakir's name, it's got an X on top of it, and it's connected to Fakir's name by a horizontal branch.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:12 am (UTC)The theory makes sense, it just isn't one I'd thought of before.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:05 am (UTC)Grimmjow: I see the argument, as he is somewhat cast in the role of her protector, and seems to respect her (such as he seems capable of showing respect). It doesn't set off my "OH BLEEPETY BLEEP NO!!!" like a couple other popular pairings for her, but I'm also not really behind it.
Matsumoto: *chokes* I refuse to say anything on this one, since you kept reading.
Tatsuki: Even if I were more into the fanon thing (and I seem more likely to go with it as f/f than most other forms) I think I like them too much as friends.
Aizen and Ulquiorra: Stockholms' Syndrome is not romantic. Or cute. Orihime doesn't have that problem, and shouldn't be treated like she does. Also, Ulquiorra (wrongly) thinks he achieved something akin to psychological rape with her. (Since you haven't reached that part: He thought he was playing a mind game with her, not realizing that she was letting him do it because she had her own plans.)
Ichigo: I don't think Ichigo is interested in anyone right now. I can, however, see it happen in a few years when they've both grown up some. Her to get over the raging first crush and develop more mature feelings, him to grow up enough to really think of anyone that way.
ETA: Err...I think that's all the fandom's big Orihime ships.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 07:34 am (UTC)But it's been a long time since I caught up.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 07:41 am (UTC)But then, my basic impression of Bleach fandom is that they're seeing a love triangle where none actually exists.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 08:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:38 am (UTC)I think he values her very much as a friend, but he was also very aware from the start that there was something up with her, and he knew that Watanuki's blind adoration would get him into trouble. I don't think, though, that he holds anythingthat happened against her, and I think that he realizes nothing was her fault.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:40 am (UTC)And hurray for Doumeki and Himawari friendship! It's so cute and quiet and understated. <3
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:41 am (UTC)Theory: Gin is a mole for Soul Society and will betray Aizen.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:45 am (UTC)Theory 2: I could go with it, but I don't think it works with the Pendulum arc.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:48 am (UTC)"Swing Back the Pendulum": The flashback arc a little while back where we saw what led to Urahara leaving the Soul Society.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:51 am (UTC)Your opinion: where the heck are Kuzco's parents?
(Beyond the obvious fact that it's Disney and no one has both parents in Disney.)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 06:03 am (UTC)You know, I just realized, Disney has this weird school obsession. "Weird school," that is, a school that is just plain odd. I mean, Hercules went to high school too. (That series was awesome but I digress.) What does education have to do with being an emperor? Okay, it should be compulsory, but I don't see that happening in ancient Aztec empires.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 06:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 06:02 am (UTC)Is better as Oracle than as Batgirl.
Batgirl: Librarian who fights crime and holds her own against Bats. Verdict: COOL!
Oracle: Gets crippled, learns how to fight ninjas from a wheelchair and creates a worldwide information network that makes her the most valuable person the superhuman community ever had. Still stands down Batman and Superman, and demands their respect. Verdict: OMG WTF AWESOMESAUCE!!!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 12:43 pm (UTC)I agree with you on Oracle :D
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 04:53 pm (UTC)Gentleman Johnnie Marcone - good, bad, sort of beige? Also, is it 'Johnnie' or 'Johnny?' There seem to be a lot of divergent opinions on the latter.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 03:17 am (UTC)