meganbmoore: (next stop: amnesia)
[personal profile] meganbmoore


With the main story set in 1893, Gigi Rowland and Camden Saybrook have been married for ten years. Society regards their marriage as courteous because they neither fight nor act too fond of each other. They’ve also been living on separate continents since the day after their wedding, for reasons known only to them.

Gigi, however, is through with that, and wants a divorce from Camden so that she can marry Freddie, a sweet but somewhat dense artist. He reminds me of a puppy, which I suspect is why Gigi liked him in the first place. Camden returns to England and agrees, on the condition that she agree to stay married for a year, during which time, they will try to produce and heir.

So, uhm, I hate this plot. Some of the most horrendous “alpha male who needs a restraining order” romance novels I’ve read over the years have had this plot, and in every one, it’s seemed to involve some poor woman forgiving the bastard for his horrible behavior due to good sex and angsty past (usually, he’s also been whoring his way through the world while she’s either been chastely wasting away at home, or dying of guilt due to one indiscretion), or getting blamed because of someone else’s manipulations. Thomas was recced to me by very reliable sources, and I thought it had to be the wrong author when I found the book at the bookstore. I was assured that it wasn’t what it seemed to be, and was actually pretty good, so I timidly went back and got it.

Thankfully, the reliable sources were right. The incident that drove them apart was actually Gigi’s fault, something that actually took me a while to get used to, as it defied every genre precedent I’ve encountered. And it wasn’t some Big Misunderstanding, but a terrible mistake that escalated, and the way things play out paints Camden in just as bad a light, and the outcome is as much his fault as Gigi’s. In fact, Thomas seems to be very aware of the inherent problems of this type of story, and strives to keep Gigi and Camden as close to equals as she possibly can at all stages, including their lives in the ten years they were separated.

The first two-thirds of the book alternate between the “present” and the events leading up their marriage ten years before. In a lot of ways, I prefer the flashback story, simply because of Gigi and Camden’s personalities there. There, Gigi is cynical and hardhearted and pragmatic, but still full of delight and able to fall headlong into love, while Camden is far too idealistic and noble, and yet grounded and in love with Gigi’s approach to life. In contrast, the “modern” Gigi is a tired, slightly watered down version of her old self, sometimes over the top, while Camden is largely angry, both at himself and at Gigi.

Despite some terminology that felt a bit too modern to me, the writing is excellent, as is the characterization. One thing I really liked was the positive portrayal of Gigi and her mother (who has her own romance that somewhat mirrors the courtship of Gigi and Camden), who would normally be the evil and conniving other women out to keep the lovers apart. The plot was mostly convincing, but a lot of the “modern” plot seemed to rely a lot on coincidence and misunderstandings, and the ending was far too easy. Still, it was an excellent first book, and I look forward to seeing what else Thomas comes up with.

Though the setting is England and all the characters are white, Thomas is Chinese, and her bio talks about how she and her English-Chinese dictionary plowed through the 600 page historical romances that were available when she was 13 and first moved to American soil. I wonder if they’re the same books my mother kept of the top shelf of our library at home, requiring me to climb on a chair and precariously stand tip-toe on one foot and brace myself against the bookcases to reach.
 

Date: 2009-02-21 05:26 pm (UTC)
ext_13427: (Default)
From: [identity profile] shiegra.livejournal.com
I remember that book! The writing was great, and I loved Gigi--and, like you, preferred the flashbacks--but in the end I couldn't get over the fact that he was forcing sex on her. It freaked me out too much and I couldn't like him enough to be happy they got back together.

Date: 2009-02-21 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com
I'm used to not caring for the guys a lot of the time in romance centric stories. (Or fandom's favorites, a lot of the time.)

Date: 2009-02-21 06:59 pm (UTC)
ext_13427: (Default)
From: [identity profile] shiegra.livejournal.com
Yeah....have you ever read Joan Wolf?

Date: 2009-02-21 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com
Nope. Or Mary Balogh of Mary Jo Putney. (A lot of the popular ones, really.)

Date: 2009-02-21 11:17 pm (UTC)
ext_13427: (Default)
From: [identity profile] shiegra.livejournal.com
Heh, I didn't realize Joan Wolf was that popular; I thought she was fairly unknown. (I've never read those other authors, either.) Anyway, I just thought I'd mention that she's the reason I stopped feeling I had to put up with all the jerk-ass romance heroes. She wrote an alpha male that was a pacifist once, and I love her heroines.

Date: 2009-02-21 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahtales.livejournal.com
Oh, yay, I am pleased the recommendations did not lead you astray! Delicious has food porn and lovely writing, too. I am really looking forward to Sherry Thomas's third book as well, though sad that her third cover has the Bared Manchest when the discreet ladies on the covers of her first two suited her writing so well.

Date: 2009-02-21 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com
The discreet ladies with their pretty dressses demurely covering their bodies are also easier to read in public! (I mean, I read clench cover books in public myself, but...)

Date: 2009-02-21 08:59 pm (UTC)
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)
From: [identity profile] estara.livejournal.com
Didn't I recommend this to you before? I mean, if it really is upsetting you in public?
http://www.etsy.com/search_results.php?search_type=tag_title&search_query=paperback+book+cover

Date: 2009-02-21 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com
Actually, I have no shame about reading mantitty and heaving bosom covers in public. It's just that I know others do.

Date: 2009-02-22 08:11 am (UTC)
ext_6284: Estara Swanberg, made by Thao (Default)
From: [identity profile] estara.livejournal.com
Ahh, it was a misunderstanding then. Personally I much prefer not being looked at strangely at the doctor's, etc., especially since I read English books (although the worst offenders were a group of German romances which had the edges of their pages coloured a very dark red). So I bought myself one ^^ which I really like.
http://www.etsy.com/view_transaction.php?transaction_id=8895963

Date: 2009-02-21 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magicnoire.livejournal.com
Alas! The first two books are getting reissued with the clinch covers!

(I've read the forthcoming third book. My first from her, actually. I like it a great deal, if only because the hero is younger and a mathematician and the woman is an aloof surgeon.)

Date: 2009-02-21 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meganbmoore.livejournal.com
I thought the trend was to reissue clench covers with "iconic" or "tasteful" covers...

Date: 2009-02-21 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magicnoire.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's what I thought too. Who knows?

Date: 2009-02-21 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] irysangel.livejournal.com
I'm guessing that sales aren't what they should be? That's when you usually see books repackaged with mantitty or a clinch, because those sell sell sell.

When you see a book go to mantitty mid-series, it's a sign that they're trying to boost sales.

Date: 2009-02-22 12:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magicnoire.livejournal.com
That makes sense. Private Arrangements was one of PW's best novels of 2008 so Bantam is probably trying to get the sales to go with the cred. (Of course that brings us back to the cred vs. sales dichotomy and whether it's generally possible to have both.)

Date: 2009-02-22 03:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahtales.livejournal.com
My jealousy is huge, especially after that tantalising description! *hatches wild plots to obtain advance copy*

Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios