meganbmoore: (ladies detective agency)

It’s 1956 in Los Angeles, and Easy Rawlins has retired from being a private eye and settled down with his wife and children. Someone has been raping and murdering black girls, but the police ignore it until a white girl from a good family suffers the same. When the police ask Easy to ask around to see who knows what, he initially refuses, preferring not to get involved, but has no choice once he learns that his old friend, Mouse, will be blamed if the real killer isn’t found.

The book is more similar to Devil in a Blue Dress than it is to A Red Death, focusing on a mystery surrounding a white woman caught up in the black neighborhood, and featuring more of Easy and Mouse investigating together. This will, however, most likely be my last Easy Rawlins book (I have a few others by Mosley that I’ll likely still read, including the Paris Minton books) due to an event fairly early in the book.

spoilers )
meganbmoore: (gina torres)
Mosley’s second Easy Rawlins book is a bit of a mixed bag for me. Set several years after Devil In A Blue Dress, A Red Death features Easy about to lose everything to an accusation of tax fraud when he’s offered an out by the FBI if he agrees to spy on a Jew suspected of being a Communist. Meanwhile, his old almost-flame, Etta, has left her husband, Mouse, who is also Easy’s best friend, and turned to Easy for sanctuary. Which may be a worse situation than a tenant of Easy’s who appears to have committed suicide, but the police suspect may have been murdered by Easy.

To me, this felt like a sequel that hadn’t quite been intended. Devil In A Blue Dress, while leaving itself open for sequels, very much was an independent, conclusive tale. Easy had a character arc that ran full circle, and had no apparent narrative need for further exploration. Which is not to say that there isn’t plenty more to write (and read) about him that’s quite worthwhile, but it did create a need to solidify a direction, and much of the book seems, to me, to be Mosley deciding what he wants to do with the series.

Mosley’s voice, however, remains very engaging and easy to read. His narrative default is the underdog, but not as the beaten underdog. He’s also a very strong character writer, with even bit characters feeling more fleshed out and interesting than many characters in other works that have technically been better developed. As a result, I spent much of the book not liking what characters were doing (largely for their own good) but unable to even be truly annoyed at them for it, when similar things have made me stop liking characters in the past.

meganbmoore: (djaq)
Like Mosley’s better known Easy Rawlins series, this is a noir story focusing on a black man and his best friend who get caught up in a series of escalating events.

Set in 1950’s L.A., Paris Minton has only recently opened a used bookshop when a woman named Love comes in, looking for help and pursued, of course, by mysterious men. Soon, he’s been beaten, shot at and robbed. And then he went home and found his store-and home-burned to the ground. He knows he needs help but his secret weapon is his brave, charming friend, Fearless Jones, a WWII veteran, who’s in jail. And so, naturally, he has to get him out.

The friendship between Paris and Fearless and overall plot play out fairly similarly to the friendship between Easy and Mouse in Devil in A Blue Dress, though some themes are different, such as the inclusion of Jews and their treatment at the time, and Mosley has come a ways as an author in between the two books. Paris and Fearless are easy to like (and I’m especially fond of Paris’s love of books) as are their supporting cast. Devil in A Blue Dress is less misogynistic than most noir, and Fearless Jones is even less so. Multiple women get to have sex without dying. Actually, I think only one woman dies, and for important plot reasons. Women also get to have sex without being temptresses out to lead our hero astray.

I was also better able to follow who killed and attacked who and why, though that did still get a little confusing.

meganbmoore: (djaq)
Most noir starts with a beautiful, mysterious woman walking into a jaded detective’s office. This starts with a white man in 1948 walking into a black bar and hiring Easy Rawlins, a war veteran who recently lost his job and is chafing under the social mores of the time, to find a white woman who recently disappeared on him. The case seems simple enough-find the woman, tell the man where to find her, get his money, and go home-but Easy finds himself getting involved in a series of double crosses and murders, until he has to get to the bottom of things or end up in jail himself.

Easy is an easy character to like, and his world weariness comes with the awareness that many of the problems he faces are caused by the color of his skin. He can take any level of hatred or mistreatment people throw at him, but he can’t take the disrespect he gets by default. In complete honesty, I couldn’t keep track of who killed and/or betrayed who and why, and I’m not even sure they were all revealed. I don’t really care that I couldn’t either. Mosley takes all the conventions of noir and filters them through the lens of someone getting every short stick society has, with amazingly effective results.

Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 26th, 2025 12:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios