Jan. 21st, 2008

meganbmoore: (Default)
I am up to ep 11 of the first season of Bleach(Ishida, I felt like I was being good, waiting so long for you to do something.  Just so you know.  I had forgotten what a prick you are initially, though.)  As far as the show itself goes...uhm...it's good and it's Bleach, but I don't have a lot else to say about it.  I have, howeverm watched some of the eps dubbed while I also did other things in the room(and while [profile] calixababbled to me about badfic) and...that's Ichigo and Rukia?  Uhm...very much not how I'd imagined their voices(keeping in mind that I'm very generous about dubbed anime, as it's all I watched the first few years.)  At all.  Orihime and Isshin are pretty good, though.

It reminded me, though, of a conversation I had not to long ago with someone(don't ask me who, I forget because I'm bad that way) about character types we identify with in manga.  The character type I tend to identify with the most in fiction is the one who, on the surface, is bookish and intelligent and doesn't seem to interact with people once, and tends to come across as superior or a jerk, but who you eventually realized is just reserved and has no social skills or idea of how to interact with people.  This especially stands out with someone like Ishida, who tends to be shown sitting off alone with his book, speaks as little as possible, and is assumed my the few who notice him or try to interact with him(except Orihime, who is too nice to ever t hink ill of anyone) to be arrogant and superior.  As we get to know him, however, we see that while he is arrogant, it's more a case of he completely lacks social skills and has no idea how to intereact with others his age, at least partly because he doesn't share their interests.  In high school, I was the girl with the book who people thought was stuck up because I always read and didn't go out and get drunk with them, and didn't use the slang or poor grammar they used.  In reality...I just had no idea how to interact with them, especially when all they wanted to talk about was boys, shopping, and parties(that seemed to involve stories about how cool it was that they got so drunk that they apparently fell on their head and couldn't remember it.)  So when I see a character like Ishida who seems arrogant and superior but is actually reserved and just lacks dissembling social skills and doesn't want to pretend to care about things he doesn't (though in his case, he definately also has a degree of arrogance going for him, too) I tend to connect with the character.   It stands out more with Ishida than others, though, because he's also the bookworm who even reads in class...I viewed breaks between classes as a chance to get a few more pages read myself.  It is, however, a character type that largely seems exclusive to males in manga. 

Which, I think, is part of why so much shojo has trouble sticking with me.  Most shojo seems to depend on the reader quickly connecting with and identifying with the heroine.  Most shojo heroines, though, fit into two categories:

1)  A combination of super cheerful, bubbly, outgoing, go-getter,  talkative girl.
2)  The shy wallflower with few friends.

The first one is a character type that I can like plenty, and often do(sometimes flatout adore,) but who I find it difficult to identify with, because they're the polar opposite of what I was at that age, and still very different from the me today.  The second category seems to be the one I should identify with, except that those girls often let themselves be used by others financially and academically, and often lack a spine until the hero's love gives them one.  Sorry, but I have and always have had a spine, and while I once let myself get pushed around some thinking it would help me fit in, I never let myself get pushed around as much as those girls do.  I may have lacked social skills, but I never lacked a feeling of self-worth, and seeing most of those heroines sit there and take it makes me want to shake them.  And, quite frankly, I never needed some boy to help me stand on my own two feet and give me a feeling of self-worth, and I hope I never do.  (Another problem I have with shojo heroines...they tend to let their self-identity get too wrapped up in their man and what he thinks of them.)  One of the reasons Skip-Beat appeals to me is that, technically, Kyoko falls into the second category...except that she grows her spine when she realizes that she's being taken adventage of by the boy she likes, and is all about punishing him for using her, then starting to grow out of the vengeance phase and into her own person largely through her rivalry and later friendship with another girl.

Because I can like but not identify with them, the more the plot starts to revolve around their romantic issues(especially the "he wants to have sex but I'm not ready" stuff) the less I can care.  Shonen, however, is different.  Because it's directed to boys, the female characters aren't put forth specifically for me to identify with, but rather for me to like, find interesting or cool, etc.  Because I'm not expected to put myself in her shoes, I never feel like I'm missing out by not directly identifying with her.

And I have no idea if any of this will even make sense to anyone but me, but there it is.
meganbmoore: (bleach-ishida's a nerd)
I am up to ep 11 of the first season of Bleach(Ishida, I felt like I was being good, waiting so long for you to do something.  Just so you know.  I had forgotten what a prick you are initially, though.)  As far as the show itself goes...uhm...it's good and it's Bleach, but I don't have a lot else to say about it.  I have, howeverm watched some of the eps dubbed while I also did other things in the room(and while [profile] calixababbled to me about badfic) and...that's Ichigo and Rukia?  Uhm...very much not how I'd imagined their voices(keeping in mind that I'm very generous about dubbed anime, as it's all I watched the first few years.)  At all.  Orihime and Isshin are pretty good, though.

It reminded me, though, of a conversation I had not to long ago with someone(don't ask me who, I forget because I'm bad that way) about character types we identify with in manga.  The character type I tend to identify with the most in fiction is the one who, on the surface, is bookish and intelligent and doesn't seem to interact with people once, and tends to come across as superior or a jerk, but who you eventually realized is just reserved and has no social skills or idea of how to interact with people.  This especially stands out with someone like Ishida, who tends to be shown sitting off alone with his book, speaks as little as possible, and is assumed my the few who notice him or try to interact with him(except Orihime, who is too nice to ever t hink ill of anyone) to be arrogant and superior.  As we get to know him, however, we see that while he is arrogant, it's more a case of he completely lacks social skills and has no idea how to intereact with others his age, at least partly because he doesn't share their interests.  In high school, I was the girl with the book who people thought was stuck up because I always read and didn't go out and get drunk with them, and didn't use the slang or poor grammar they used.  In reality...I just had no idea how to interact with them, especially when all they wanted to talk about was boys, shopping, and parties(that seemed to involve stories about how cool it was that they got so drunk that they apparently fell on their head and couldn't remember it.)  So when I see a character like Ishida who seems arrogant and superior but is actually reserved and just lacks dissembling social skills and doesn't want to pretend to care about things he doesn't (though in his case, he definately also has a degree of arrogance going for him, too) I tend to connect with the character.   It stands out more with Ishida than others, though, because he's also the bookworm who even reads in class...I viewed breaks between classes as a chance to get a few more pages read myself.  It is, however, a character type that largely seems exclusive to males in manga. 

Which, I think, is part of why so much shojo has trouble sticking with me.  Most shojo seems to depend on the reader quickly connecting with and identifying with the heroine.  Most shojo heroines, though, fit into two categories:

1)  A combination of super cheerful, bubbly, outgoing, go-getter,  talkative girl.
2)  The shy wallflower with few friends.

The first one is a character type that I can like plenty, and often do(sometimes flatout adore,) but who I find it difficult to identify with, because they're the polar opposite of what I was at that age, and still very different from the me today.  The second category seems to be the one I should identify with, except that those girls often let themselves be used by others financially and academically, and often lack a spine until the hero's love gives them one.  Sorry, but I have and always have had a spine, and while I once let myself get pushed around some thinking it would help me fit in, I never let myself get pushed around as much as those girls do.  I may have lacked social skills, but I never lacked a feeling of self-worth, and seeing most of those heroines sit there and take it makes me want to shake them.  And, quite frankly, I never needed some boy to help me stand on my own two feet and give me a feeling of self-worth, and I hope I never do.  (Another problem I have with shojo heroines...they tend to let their self-identity get too wrapped up in their man and what he thinks of them.)  One of the reasons Skip-Beat appeals to me is that, technically, Kyoko falls into the second category...except that she grows her spine when she realizes that she's being taken adventage of by the boy she likes, and is all about punishing him for using her, then starting to grow out of the vengeance phase and into her own person largely through her rivalry and later friendship with another girl.

Because I can like but not identify with them, the more the plot starts to revolve around their romantic issues(especially the "he wants to have sex but I'm not ready" stuff) the less I can care.  Shonen, however, is different.  Because it's directed to boys, the female characters aren't put forth specifically for me to identify with, but rather for me to like, find interesting or cool, etc.  Because I'm not expected to put myself in her shoes, I never feel like I'm missing out by not directly identifying with her.

And I have no idea if any of this will even make sense to anyone but me, but there it is.

Cosplay

Jan. 21st, 2008 12:52 pm
meganbmoore: (Default)
[profile] crumpeteer posted some cosplay last week for Bleach and Samurai Deeper Kyo.

Here is the SDK.  All cosplayers are female.  All characters are male.  I am just grateful there was no Kyo.  Or Bontenmaru.  Kotaro is scarily good, though.  

Here is the Bleach, though there is some debate about the Ishida, I think all cosplayers are gender appropriate here. (Includes a character who hasn't shown up in the US releases yet, but I don't think that's an issue for anyone here.)

Cosplay

Jan. 21st, 2008 12:52 pm
meganbmoore: (bleach-ishida is superior)
[profile] crumpeteer posted some cosplay last week for Bleach and Samurai Deeper Kyo.

Here is the SDK.  All cosplayers are female.  All characters are male.  I am just grateful there was no Kyo.  Or Bontenmaru.  Kotaro is scarily good, though.  

Here is the Bleach, though there is some debate about the Ishida, I think all cosplayers are gender appropriate here. (Includes a character who hasn't shown up in the US releases yet, but I don't think that's an issue for anyone here.)

meganbmoore: (Default)
...while I can never decide whether or not I like Byakuya in Bleach, I am always deeply appreciative of his ability to summon thousands of falling sakura petals at will.  And the noodle hair.  That's always impressive.

*rewatches the spontaneous cascade of sakura petals, just for the fun of it*
meganbmoore: (bleach-rukia's small but will kick your)
...while I can never decide whether or not I like Byakuya in Bleach, I am always deeply appreciative of his ability to summon thousands of falling sakura petals at will.  And the noodle hair.  That's always impressive.

*rewatches the spontaneous cascade of sakura petals, just for the fun of it*
meganbmoore: (Default)

This is from [livejournal.com profile] telophase's generator. Because she's 1000 times more obsessed with Bleach as I am.



meganbmoore's Zanpakutō:
(Fourth Division Irregulars)

Sprocket is a fluffy scythe with wood paneling. When you activate it with the command "Where's my Bucket?" it causes all your opponent's hair to fall out, instantaneously.

What's Your Zanpakutō?

meganbmoore: (bleach-ichigo's overcompensating)

This is from [livejournal.com profile] telophase's generator. Because she's 1000 times more obsessed with Bleach as I am.



meganbmoore's Zanpakutō:
(Fourth Division Irregulars)

Sprocket is a fluffy scythe with wood paneling. When you activate it with the command "Where's my Bucket?" it causes all your opponent's hair to fall out, instantaneously.

What's Your Zanpakutō?

meganbmoore: (Default)
 I remain obsessed with the art in xXxHolic.  Typically, I'm neutral on the art front.  All I really require of art in sequentially illustrated storytelling is that it not hurt my eyes and competently tell the story.  I think this comes from reading comics since I was 12.  With over half my life spent with good art randomly being replaced with art so bad it hurts to look at, I can be generous as long as it does the job and is consistent, I'm good.  Besides, after Skottie Young, manga art can do nothing to me.

I make an exception, though, when the art style and execution is central to the book, such as in xXxHolic and Blade of the Immortal.  The art in xXxHolic is an extreme study in black and white and negative imaging.  There are no greys and no shading.  Where there would usually be shading, there is either pure linework with some blacks and a bit of the condensed "shading" lines(as opposed to the full shading of most manga art), heavy blacks, or thin black lines of varying density to create the illusion of shading, all of which adds to the mythical and otherworldly feel.


meganbmoore: (xxxholic-white)
 I remain obsessed with the art in xXxHolic.  Typically, I'm neutral on the art front.  All I really require of art in sequentially illustrated storytelling is that it not hurt my eyes and competently tell the story.  I think this comes from reading comics since I was 12.  With over half my life spent with good art randomly being replaced with art so bad it hurts to look at, I can be generous as long as it does the job and is consistent, I'm good.  Besides, after Skottie Young, manga art can do nothing to me.

I make an exception, though, when the art style and execution is central to the book, such as in xXxHolic and Blade of the Immortal.  The art in xXxHolic is an extreme study in black and white and negative imaging.  There are no greys and no shading.  Where there would usually be shading, there is either pure linework with some blacks and a bit of the condensed "shading" lines(as opposed to the full shading of most manga art), heavy blacks, or thin black lines of varying density to create the illusion of shading, all of which adds to the mythical and otherworldly feel.


Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 02:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios