Dark Lover by J.R Ward
Nov. 15th, 2007 11:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Near the end of this book, the heroine watches the hero get her name carved into his back as part of the wedding ceremony, and wonders why her named couldn't by Mary or Sue, instead of Elizabeth. i feel that scene is the perfect example of what to expect here.
Dark Lover is the first book in J.R. Ward's Black Dagger Brotherhood series, which
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I will be completely honest: I have no idea if this book was good or bad. I'm not sure if I like it. I couldn't tell you a thing about what I think of the romance(In fact, it's possible that the relationship between Butch and Marissa was more developed than that between Wrath and Beth). I am too busy being in awe. Let's observe:
These are vampires. They are giant, hulking gothy things who own nothing but black leather. The characters have names like Wrath, Tohrment, Zsadist, Phury, Butch, Rhage, Vishous and Mr. X. Oh, and Beth and Marissa. The main character of this book, Wrath, is the leader of the group 6'6", wears black leather, has long hair, and wears wraparound glasses to hide strange eyes. He absolutely does NOT remind me of anyone from Dark Hunters and wouldn't even if you gave him a tattoo that could turn into a mouthy demon. The villains become castrated to become near-immortal vampire haters and take out their frustration in sadism. The heroes sit around talking about how much they want to kill things. One of them says you can't claim to have been wounded in battle until you can use your intestines as a belt while stitching himself up.
And just as good as Mary and Sue is Butch pondering why vampires have such names and then realizing he could never take a vampire named Harold or Charlie seriously. I have to admire a writer so amazingly aware of the absurdity and cliches of her chosen genre.
It doesn't have as much camp and cheese as the Dark Hunters books do(or at least, not the same kind) but Beth, though still a Mary Sue, didn't annoy me as much as most Dark Hunters heroines do. Then again, I was never completely distracted by other things there as I am here. It also doesn't have the cool if often contradictory mythology Dark Hunters has, but then, I tghink it took a few books for that to get going there, too, so we'll see.
As I said, I have no idea if this is good, and I don't know if "like" is the right word for my opinion of the book, but I have the next 2 books in the series and I shall read them if for no other reason than to stare in awe.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:11 pm (UTC)Oh, and it introduced John Matthew and again, doomed!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 04:49 pm (UTC)I have no idea who John Matthew is,, but I see what you meant before about Zsadist.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 05:27 pm (UTC)The most whiny emo of the brothers is Phury, truthfully. I mean, Vishous did engage in some crazy angsting in book 4 but that was more lovesick mooning than Phury, who not only does lovesick mooning but also does whiny emo bitching in book 5. ("I am more special than you!")
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:00 pm (UTC)well, Z's and Rhage's books are okay, but after that, imho, they go downhill as romances. But the backstory and the drama, and the world she's created gets more and more complex and interesting to me.
I almost wish she'd drop the romance and just make it urban fantasy. but that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 11:05 pm (UTC)I have similar reactions to more romance novels than i care to think about.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 05:18 pm (UTC)