meganbmoore: (beneath)
 I watched the first 2 episodes of MTV's Scream (based on the movies) and liked them.  It enjoys the meta without being obnoxious about it, and borrows heavily from Pretty Little Liars, and some from Harper's Island* too (and notably did NOT talk about either when discussing  gothic and slasher TV shows).

THAT SAID, it has THE MOST GENERIC LOOKING CAST EVER.  Every time a character shows up, I looked up the actor to see where I knew them from because I was SO SURE I'd seen them in something where they had another major role, but NOPE.  Aside from a couple of guest roles I don't even remember, the only ones I can claim any familiarity with are Brooke's dad (who was in Mad Men for a while) and Audrey (was was briefly in season 2 of iZombie.  Sadly, she was not as genre savvy there as I would have liked.)  I do wonder if it isn't at least partly deliberate when it comes to some of the teens, but I doubt I'll lose any sleep over that.

*I will not be convinced that Brooke's actress wasn't cast partly because she looks like Chloe's actress.
meganbmoore: (pll: ot4)
194 x Pretty Little Liars (second half of season 2) 

plls2-2 35 plls2-2 177 plls2-2 115

here ) .




meganbmoore: (pll: ot4)
 You might be thinking that it's been quiet here this week because I've been obsessively playing flight Rising.  This is partly true, but actually,  I haven't been home much thanks to my church's Vacation Bible School.  Thanks to this great storm we had last night with quarter sized hail, 80mph winds and literal walls of dust, however, I woke up this morning to 2 flat tires.  YAY!  So no work today thanks too that.

It did, however, mean I finally got to watch the PLL premiere, though I'll probably go back to watching it in huge chunks after this, but I wanted to see what it did with one thing.

spoilers complain a lot )
meganbmoore: (pll: ot4)
-Well, we got a fair number of answers in the finale. There were quite a few that we didn't. but there were more straight answers than I was expecting.

spoilers are hoping for character death )
meganbmoore: (pll: ot4)
157 x Pretty Little Liars (first half of season 2)

plls2 52 plls2 20 plls2 104

here )
meganbmoore: (emilia: eat your brains)
So, I was going along happily, catching up with what's aired of the second half of this season's Pretty Little Liars. and then I got to the point where a character is illegally using ADHD medications (presumably ritalin, since fiction thinks that's the only kind that exists) and was BLINDED BY RAGE. And still am.

THANKS FOR CRIMINALIZING MY BRAIN AGAIN, FICTION.

(I'm borrowing that phrase from [personal profile] metatxt , who also provided feedback, but it's very accurate.)

Note: Most of what I'm going to say here is based on my personal experiences (and so more skewed to ADD and ADHD) and discussions with others (both friends with ADD or ADHD, and medical professionals I've consulted with over the years) as opposed to an intensive study conducted for the purposes of this post or any such. In addition, some things vary by regions and doctor preferences, but the gist should remain true throughout.


I have ADD, not ADHD, but score high enough on overlapping symptoms that I'm technically diagnosed for both. And aside from perpetuating bad stereotypes and helping to further the idea that ADD and ADHD aren't real, EVERYTHING about how that played out is ridiculously unrealistic. I know, the wrong complaint to make about this show, but still. (And it's hardly the first time the show has epically failed in this general area.)

But here's the thing: to start with, a teenager calling a doctor and saying "Hey, my kid suddenly has ADHD, something she's never shown symptoms of before and never been diagnosed with (or possibly hasn't taken anything for for years, if she has been). Can you prescribe some meds right off the bat?" would, at best, be laughed out at. A doctor won't even talk to you about medication for ADD or ADHD until you actually visit a psychologist and get an official diagnosis. Most likely, the psychologist will also discuss medication options with you at that time, as well as coping mechanisms. THEN your doctor will meet with you (and your parents, if you're a minor) to discuss options. Because there was a period where doctors, not yet knowing much about the condition because it was only recently accepted within medical fields, would overdiagnose ADD and ADHD for almost any disruptive behavior or inattentiveness or problems with studying. This time is long gone, and because of it, they're now extremely strict with the diagnosis and prescriptions. Most people, however, don't bother to learn about ADD or ADHD (for that matter, most think it's the same thing) and so their opinion of it falls into tow main categories. The first is that ADD and ADHD is a term used to describe disruptive behavior and learning problems in youths, and that this is not an actual medical condition, but something that you grow out of. The second (and the one being endorsed by the show) is that ADD and ADHD still aren't "really real" and instead the condition is an excuse used to get drugs. You also have people who are forgetful or prone to going off at the mouth who spend 5 minutes on google and self-diagnose themselves but "don't need to see anyone about it." These stereotypes are incredibly harmful. Because of them, people who do have the conditions get bullied, dismissed and treated like addicts because, you know, their brains don't really exist, they're just making them up.

The type of medication that we always see in fiction that has an almost instant influence on energy and focus and then just as quickly stops working after a certain period of time (henceforth usually referred to as "XR" or "ritalin and the like") will rarely be the first recommendation. Pretty much never, these days. Like, at all, with options such as strattera, which is safe for everyone, though unfortunately, also a medication that you can eventually build up a resistance to, available. When it is prescribed, it will usually be for a child, who only really needs it for a certain period of time each day. Older teenagers and adults, who also have to worry about work, caring for their living space, being responsible for other people, driving, etc will be put on slow release medications. There are a variety of these, but most will take several days or even a couple weeks to take full affect, and just as long to completely stop working. This is so that you won't actually have drastic changes in behavior, and to prevent withdrawal symptoms if you run out, switch medications (either because the one you have doesn't work right for you, or because your body has built up a resistance to it, which sometimes happens) or even if you decide you want to see how you'll do without it. While there are many adults and teens who take ritalin and the like, they will most likely only be prescribed to them if nothing else works for them. Oh yes, there's also the bit where some doctors "don't feel comfortable" prescribing these medications (been there, done that) or will only prescribe certain ones. If they can't help you, they'll refer you to someone else. So, pretty much, no one is getting a prescription for ADD or ADHD meds the same day they first bring it up to a doctor, unless they just have an extremely unprofessional and careless medical professional. In which case, they need to go shopping for a new one. And unless you get your kid diagnosed and then literally steal medication from children, you probably aren't getting the kind that has the immediate affect. And if you're insisting to your doctor that you need that kind, alarm bells are going off in the doctor's head. Loudly. While i've always been able to get my prescriptions filled by fax (I've only taken sustained release meds as an adult) I'm told that in some areas, you can only get a prescription filled by hand delivering an original copy to a pharmacy. Some of these drugs will also require a legal adult to pick them up, even if they're prescribed to a teenager. Depending on what you're taking, in the first 6 months to a year that you're on a medication, the doctor will often want to see you more frequently to follow your progress and see how it's working.

Next up is just what these drugs do. The purpose of these medications is not to supercharge you and trigger hyperfocus. Yes, ritalin and the like can have this effect, but that actually largely takes place when it's kicking in and wearing off. The most basic way to describe ADD and ADHD is that the control centers of the brain don't work properly. The core difference between ADD and ADHD is how the control centers don't properly function, and how it outwardly manifests. Typically, the issue is actually that the brain is already hypercharged. For example, tell someone to quickly make a mathematical equation that equals 4, and and most people will probably come up with one of these: "2+2," "1+3," "2x2," "(1+1)x2," etc. Tell someone with ADD or ADHD to do the same, and you're going to get something more like "([{1x32}/16]x4)-4." This is not to say that ADD or ADHD make you brilliant mathematicians, but that people with ADD and ADHD have brains where every subject or thought process is like a ping pong ball bouncing around inside their heads, competing with other ping pong balls for space. We will, typically, reach the same point as everyone else, but in a very convoluted way. (Also, unless you're using it as an allegory for the plot of a mystery novel, "([{1x32}/16]x4)-4" serves little to no practical use when "2+2" is also an available option.) There's also multitasking. People think that those who have ADD and ADHD are good at multitasking, but that isn't actually what's going on. What's going on is that we can't NOT multitask. Our brains have 5 or so ping pong balls bouncing around at all times, all demanding our attention, and typically, we lack the ability to filter out stimuli. So what you have is a person who is constantly easily distracted, always has 5 things demanding attention, and lacks the typical controls to just focus on one topic at a time. There's also the fact that, when you constantly have that much going on, things slip through the cracks. This means you get distracted midsentence and don't even realize it, or you abruptly switch topics in the middle of discussing one, or you don't realize when someone is trying to talk to you (like, say, a teacher who thinks you're goofing off), or you simply space out while thinking about something (if in public, people start thinking you're staring at something, often them, but really, you aren't even aware of what it is that you're apparently staring at) and you suddenly lose 20 minutes of your life. You know that thing where you think you forgot to turn off the oven, and worry about it all day? For ADD and ADHD, that can be twenty things every day. The problem is, there's a good probability that you DID forget to turn off the oven, mail your bill, and call to renew your prescription. But you did remember to preorder that movie that Amazon had for 50% off this morning, because no matter what you tell it to do, your brain is going to prioritize by what it likes, not what you need. The even bigger problem is that, as you get older, you KNOW that you're doing this, which, in turn, can start causing anxiety problems, especially when your brain doesn't have an off switch or pause button that will let you stop or reroute a process, even when you know you should. And then you have a minimeltdown because you're having difficulty scheduling an appointment, because you know that if you can't get this accomplished right now, you might not be able to get your brain to prioritize doing this important thing again. This is also part of why people with ADD and ADHD are often very prone to headaches, because the brain simply isn't meant to operate that way.

Most people believe that medications create hyperfocus, but in actuality, they help reduce the need for it. Hyperfocus is a defense mechanism that people develop over time, forcing their brains to go from one extreme (5 things ping ponging around in your head at once) to the other (exclusive focus on one subject, and completely blocking out anything else). The problem with hyperfocus is that it's also hard to control. You learn it so you can get things done, but it can be triggered by pretty much anything, and it's difficult to snap yourself out of it. Typically, hyperfocus will only end when either the task is completed (or you run out of whatever you were doing) or an outside stimuli forces itself in. What medication does is it helps bridge the gap in your brain between the two. It doesn't prevent either the ping ponging or the hyperfocus, but it helps make you aware of both when they're happening, and increases your chances of being able to control it, as well as your ability to control how various stimuli affect you. Because it eases the stress on your brain, it also helps with the headaches and anxiety. Stimulants can also make you sleepy, and one reason the doctor will want to see you fairly often early on is to see if this is a drug your brain needs to help it function more peacefully and effectively, or if you need to be on something else.

And finally, there's availability. Contrary to popular belief, doctors have this funny thing where they tend to be strict about medication that affects how your brain works. These stories where teenagers and the like are selling part of their prescription to others is, generally speaking, laughable. While there are certainly irresponsible practitioners out there who don't monitor these things, most practitioners do.  (If not for ethical reasons  then because, you know, they want to keep those licenses they worked hard for.)  These are medications where you take a certain amount each day, and you only get enough to supply you for a certain period of time. (True of most prescriptions, but people seem to think not for ADD and ADHD.) If you say you need an emergency refill once because you lost it, you might get a pass and a lecture. Do it again a few months later and MAYBE a very trusting doctor will take into account that you have a condition that makes you prone to losing and forgetting things in general, and which is extremely amplified in certain situations. Most likely, though, your doctor is going to want to see you before giving you anything else, because you're probably setting off those alarm bells again. Your doctor is also going to want you to keep your six month (or however often) checkups, and isn't going to automatically renew your prescription if you're skipping out. Why? Because, like most prescription drugs, it's possible that taking these prescription drugs can affect your body in other ways as well, and your doctor is going to keep an eye on that.

Also, the latest episode is almost entirely that character having a hallucination because of withdrawal. Because the best way to make a statement about drug abuse is to criminalize the use of legal medications that many people need to be able to function normally, because no one really has ADHD or ADD after childhood, and it's only used after that by students who don't really need it, but think abusing it will help them with their grades.

BAD SHOW BAD.

(Also, the hallucination was a B&W noir story in which the character pieces together various bits of the ongoing mystery, and normally I'd love that, but the context made that impossible.)

I likely won't make a separate post for spoilers and whatnot for these episodes, but feel free to ask whatever you want in comments. (And I still love it overall and have no intentions of dropping it, but this plotline is too personal and too "how people see me" for me to really be able to talk about other parts of the show without prompting.)

i've been informed that at least one other show is also indulging in this variety of fail right now, which makes it even more depressing.
meganbmoore: (pll: spencer looking back)
The Pretty Little Liars Halloween episode was about 30% a PLL episode, and 70% a backdoor pilot for Ravenswood. Which was immediately followed by the actual Ravenswood pilot. Thankfully, I went in forewarned and so already had my expectations adjusted. The parts that actually were PLL were good and have me very eager for the second half of the season.

And then there's Ravenswood itself, which seems to be trying hard both to keep the crossover PLL fans happy and to separate itself from PLL as much as possible. Ravenswood is another of this seasons new gothic shows, this time about 5 teens in a small town known for its weirdness. The teens (one of whom is Caleb from PLL, meaning that PLL now has NO major male characters who I like at all, unless they bring Caleb and/or Jason back) appear to be part of a curse, and at least two of them are possibly doppelgangers of residents who died over a century ago. The curse may or may not be connected to a flood from somewhere around the same time that killed many of the town's residents.

I'm not sure about what they've chosen to do with Nicole Gale Anderson's character at all (and that's not even touching on the whitewashing) and I think it's going to take it a little while to really find its footing, but I'm interested.

spoilers )


I'm also current with Witches of East End, which continues to be charming and delightful, if not necessarily a high quality show. Also, watching the latest episode just after rewatching Practical Magic really emphasized the similarities between them. (Note that I'm not complaining about those similarities.

spoilers )


With Ravenswood out, I think I'm through with the new shows of the season that i'll be following, though there are a couple I'll likely check out on DVD, or start watching if I hear something about them that makes me think I need to get on that train already.
meganbmoore: (pll: spencer looking back)
I haven't posted properly on this show since somewhere in season 1 (because I kept being behind and then watching in huge chunks tht didn't get me caught up and then I talk about it for hours in IMs...)


spoilers )

and sundry

Jun. 17th, 2013 04:56 pm
meganbmoore: (arang: boat)
1. Thanks to the wonders of kindle and the internet, I've acquired a decent selection of wuxia novels to try out (a couple of these aren't actually wuxia, but I'm including them anyway):

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 7


What should be my first wuxia novel?

View Answers

Legend of the White-Haired Demoness
3 (42.9%)

Legend of the Condor Heroes
0 (0.0%)

Return of the Condor Heroes
0 (0.0%)

A Deadly Secret
0 (0.0%)

Ode to Gallantry
0 (0.0%)

Romance of the Three Kingdoms
1 (14.3%)

The Book & The Sword
0 (0.0%)

Journey to the West
3 (42.9%)

The Legendary Siblings
0 (0.0%)



(My personal inclinations are Legend of the White-Haired Demoness and Legend of the Condor Heroes, but I bow to the advice of people who have actually read wuxia novels before.)

If you know of a wuxia novel that's available in English (either through licensed translations or fan translations with working links) that you'd think I'd like but don't have listed, please feel free to rec them.

2.I'm very behind on kdramas and do terribly at trying to watch airing dramas (when I try to, I manage to stay roughly on top of things until around episode 10, and then I flake and wait until it's done. Since I don't even do a good job of keeping up with shows I can watch as soon as they air and son't have to wait for subtitles for, this shouldn't surprise anyone) but I think I'm going to try to follow Sword and Flower as it airs. It's about a princess who sets out to get revenge on the military dictator who killed her father and then inconveniently falls in love with his son. Not sure how long it's is, but hopefully they'll keep it in the 16-20 episode range, as I think that's about as far as they could stretch that premise. trailer:



3. This isn't brand new news, but The Bletchley Circle has been picked up for a second season. Based on wikipedia, it'll be 4 episodes and they're adding Hattie Morahan to the main cast though hopefully not at the expense of the existing female leads.) Also, new episodes of Poirot and Marple have aired in the UK, though I haven't watched them yet.

4. I am very behind on TV in general and not doing a good job of applying myself when when it comes to fixing that (and am managing to fall even further behind despite several of the shows being on hiatus) but I have now watched all of the first 3 seasons on Community and Pretty Little Liars and have almost finished season 2 of The Good Wife, and while I'm overwhelmed at the idea of trying to write up my thoughts on them, please feel free to ask for my thoughts on anything up to those points. (Aside: only ask about paintball in Community if you want squealing and handflapping, and I don't recommend asking about Toby or Ezra in Pretty Little Liars if you like hearing positive things about them.) I've also almost finished Fox Volant of Snowy Mountain, and it's pretty solid and I've been enjoying it well enough, but it's not overly engaging and I have no strong thoughts or feelings on it or most of the characters.

5. So, I haven't watched The Fall and don't really intend to, but I am curious about opinions of those who have on this article (unsurprisingly by a dude) which argues that The Fall is feminist, effectively, for not glorifying the serial killer who kills women and for having the female lead tell him he's nothing but a pathetic misogynist. Mind you, this is my reading from the article, and you and I may watch it and come out with VERY readings, but apparently, the bare basics of awareness is what we aspire to now? The article: http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/can_a_show_about_murdering_women_actually_be_feminist/singleton/

Note: I didn't look at them just now in bringing up the link, but based on what was there this morning I do not recommend reading the comments, as they were very faily and triggery and several commenters were trying to make the focus all about violence against men. (Which I do think theere's issues with violence against men in the media and how it's "ok" for women to hit men because they're physically weaker, as seems to be Hollywood's reasoning, but I don't think that comes anywhere close to the media's issues with violence against women, or the portrayal of women's corpses in many things.)
meganbmoore: (the bletchley circle: ordinary)
 Know what's cool?  Amazon having decent prices on a lot of new/still airing TV shows with female (often in multiples) leads that not enough people are watching.  (What's not cool is having to remind myself that no, I actually DON'T have a lot of money to spare, most of what looks like fun money in my account is for WisCon.)

Season 1 of Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries for $26.94.  1920s flapper runs around solving mysteries and flirting with stoic detective.  Exceptionally fun, and i think the only show I've seen in which the heroine is promiscuous for no reason other than that SHE LIKES SEX (no angst or self-punishment or any such) and with an ongoing romance plot where the female half of the equation regularly hooks up with other men without once being judged by the dude or the text, or showing us her sexlife through his POV.  Also, hats and adorable sidekicks galore.

Call the Midwife Season 1 for $22.86.  1950s London, midwives who work out of a convent.  Based on the memoirs of Jennifer Worth (which are also a good read).  Sometimes lovely fluff, sometimes whimsical, sometimes utterly depressing, there's a large variety of personality types between the midwives and the nuns both, and tons of focus on women's relationships and the  changing world.

Parks and Recreation Season 1 for $11.49.  Presumably well known enough that I don't need to explain much?  Hilarious and sometimes awkward adventures of a small town civil servant who aspires to be president and make all women in the government ever proud.  Equally hilarious friends and coworkers galore.

Pretty Little Liars Season 1 for $14.96.  Take a Chrisopher Pike book, update it a bit, and then make it all about 4   BFFs trying to solve the murder of their friend, passing the Bechdel test in about 4 out of 5 scenes, while also having a ton of focus on their relationships with each other and their mothers, lots of gothic imagery, and just all around cracky and sometimes cheesy awesomeness.  Oh, and one is a lesbian WOC who gets a lot of action.

The Bletchley Circle for $15.59.  3-part miniseries (which will hopefully eventually have a second season?) about 4 women who were Bletchley Park codebreakers who reunite in the 50s to catch a serial killer.  A bit too devoted to the procedural aspect for me at times, but rather fabulous and a good look at what it was like to go back to being "ordinary" women after the war, especially if you did awesome stuff you can never tell anyone about.  Also, if you ever went "how would people treat Sherlock Holmes if he were a woman?" well, its a few decades later and Susan has considerably better people skills, but this is the closest to a direct take I've seen on that.

Continuum Season 1 for $26.14.  Time travelling cop saving the future from time travelling terrorists!  It has something of a bad habit of focusing more on the male supporting characters than the female, but most characters are interesting in their own right, and Kiera's awesomeness makes up for the rest.

Body of Proof Season 1 for $15.63.  Like Bones, something of a "female Sherlock Holmes" protagonist, with the brilliance largely focused on one medical field.  And, aside from Bones, the only case of a "genius/wrangler" setup where the wildcard genius is the female lead.  Protagonist is a former brain surgeon who can no longer practice due to injuries sustained in a car crash, and now works as a medical examiner and solves crime.  Adorable partners and coworkers galore.

Nikita Season 1 for $16.93.  Best known series in the list?  Unbelievably awesome ex-assassin working to bring down evil organization and save friends.  What  makes Nikita herself extra-awesome is that someone decided to take the trope of the damaged, stone-cold badass assassin on a mission and ditch the "stone-cold" part and create a character who, despite all the angst and traumatic background and badassery, is a warm and caring person who always sees the good in people and inspires loyalty as much for her warmth and determination to help you as for her badassery and drive.  Other great assassins and ex-assassins and soldiers and evil psychologists galore.

The Good Wife Season 1 for $25.55.  I've only seen the first 4 episodes of this so far and so can't say a lot about the series as a whole, but what I've seen I've liked a lot, despite early reservations about the premise.

Honorable mention:

The Hour Series 1 for $26.34.  Honourable mention because the technical main character is a dude.  (Who is quite annoying in the first season, but I found him more likable in the second.)  If you ever thought you might like Mad Men, but wished there was more focus on the female characters and that the men were less douchey, you'd probably like this.  Despite my description, this really isn't "BBC trying to have their own Mad Men," which it often gets described as (though the first episode does have something of a "wants to be Mad Men" feel to it).  I'm sure MM was something of an inspiration, but its less about nostalgia and deconstructing nostalgia, and more of a cold war-like thriller from the POV of journalists, many of whom are struggling with their assigned roles, and the creation of a new form of news programming.  Fair warning:  Series 2 was made with the belief that a third series was in the bag, and ends with a cliffhanger, and then BBC went and cancelled it.




meganbmoore: (borgias: giulia/vannozza)
1.  Someone remind me why Sherlock had evidence taped up all over the bathroom in ep 9 of Elementary.  I was looking at caps of the episode the other days and for the life of me, I cannot remember why he did that.

2.  I have discovered the existence of a romance novel called The Roman's Virgin Mistress.  The description actually describes the 1st century Roman as a playboy.  I am not making this up.  I am considering attempting to read it, but i don't know if my ability to force myself to deliberately read what appears to be awful fiction (and for all I know, it's a great book with terrible presentation by the publisher) just to point at the awfulness.

3.  Apparently both Caleb and Jason's actors are leaving Pretty Little Liars for other shows.  NOES THEY ARE THE ONLY MAJOR MALE CHARACTERS ON THE SHOW WHO I ACTUALLY LIKE.  (Though I'm only about 1/3 through season 3, it could change.)  Take Toby and Lucas and Garrett instead.

4.    I'm almost definitely using airmiles to stay until Wednesday at Wiscon, and so still in the market for roommates for the extra day if anyone else is staying longer.  (Also, any locals want to recommend things for me to do downtown Tuesday afternoon and Monday morning?)

5.  I've started watching Community and am almost through with the first season and enjoy it (though I like pretty much everyone but Pierce more than I like Jeff.  I kind of wish there were no Pierce.) even though it gives me secondhand embarrassment at times, and the "we know this is faily but you know that we know and don't think you should approve so it's ok" doesn't  work for me a lot of the time.

TeeVee

Apr. 2nd, 2013 11:56 pm
meganbmoore: (white collar: sara/neal: scamming)
Just scratching the surface of what I'm behind on, but progress is progress?

Elementary 1.18:

spoilers )

Once Upon A Time 2.15-2.16: I liked the episode about Snow's mother about as much as I expected to (A LOT). I liked Cora's backstory less than expectedm due to the fact that, as much as I like Cora's ruthlessness and ambition, that was the biggest "missing the point of your source material" yet of the series. The fact that I can consistently care less about Rumples and now Neal every episode is approaching the miraculous.

spoilers )

Very much looking forward to what they do with Snow and Regina next. I know I'm still a couple episodes behind, but I'm not particularly interested in what I understand to be the main plots of the next 2 episodes. ("The Stranger," and August. Part of me is still recovering from the abject boredom and pointlessness of the Whale episode a while back.)

Person of Interest 2.17-2.18: I have no deep thoughts, but I hope the HR plotline is wrapped up by the end of this season.

spoilers )

White Collar 4.14-4.16:  Hilarie Burton really does the Audrey Hepburn look well, doesn't she?  (Still not thrilled with how her hair keeps getting lighter and lighter.  Though I think she was usually blonde before WC?  And yes, when people change their hair in my shows', I obsess over it.)

spoilers that have nothing to do with Hilarie Burton's hair )

The trailer for Graceland that was at the end of the WC finale looked quite dull.

I've also been catching up with Pretty Little Liars.  You may recall that I was very in love with it a while back, and then suddenly stopped talking about it.  That's because it was group watching, and we all got sidetracked.  But I'm about 1/4 of the way through season 3 now, and loving it.  But wow, what is it with Melissa and pedophiles?  Like EVERY SINGLE GUY she's been interested in has chased after at least one teenaged girl way too young for him, and some more than one.  Is the woman just a pedophile magnet, or something?  I'm actually very fond of Melissa, but her taste in men is just horrific.  (Oddly, while I don't care for Ezra and find Aria/Ezra icky in general, not to mention boring, it's also very much a "wrong because of their ages" thing?  Like, I don't get the same pedophile vibe from him that I do from Ian, Wren or Garrett, and actually get why they're compatible?  It's just the NO STOP DATING YOUR STUDENT DUDE, GEEZ part.  I suppose it helps that Aria was the pursuer there and Ezra spends half his time apparently inwardly berating himself, BUT WHY MUST THE PLOTLINE EXIST?)
meganbmoore: (vd: ordinary girls)
Actually, more than this week’s TV, as I’m a bit behind in posting on Pretty Little Liars. (And less than this week’s TV, because I haven’t watched White Collar. It seems to be universally regarded as Bad, so I’ll wait until there’s a good ep to follow it up with.)

1. Nikita was, well, Nikita. Dealing with foreign politics. This is not the show’s strong suit. But there was Nikita with guns. And Michael actually using his brain. (This is a show where the bad guys can’t use their brains too much, or the good guys’ plans will fall apart altogether. I really should be more critical about that.) But the best part was Nikita breaking off her heals because you can’t run and fight in high heals. Hmm…unless the best part was Nikita apparently, uhm, actually caring about minors drinking.

2. Pretty Little Liars continues to be giddy fun. Like, I don’t even care that the on guy who wasn’t creepy, a pedophile, or a Nice Guy left in a (understandable but misguided) huff, even though I really, really don’t like it when I dislike everyone of one gender in my shows.

spoilers through 1.15 )3. Vampire Diaries was much better this week than it was last week. Not that that would have been hard. But it’s the whiplash effect, where one episode, I’m all “I WANT TO DROP THIS SHOW AND NEVER TOUCH IT AGAIN! Except for this part.” and the next episode is “OMG! OMG! OMG! Except this part. OMG!”

spoilers through 2.13 )
meganbmoore: (vd: kill you with my brain)

45 x Damages
34 x Joseon X-Files/Secret Investigation Record
31 x Nikita
65 x Pretty Little Liars
46 x The Undercovers
70 x Vampire Diaries

  
  

the rest at my lj
meganbmoore: (pll: its canon)

Oh, show, did you...just have Hanna shipping herself with Allison in her (probable/possible) dream, and casting Allison as an avenging hero?  I think you did.


Spoilers involve Peace Bras )
meganbmoore: (Default)

I feel odd posting this when almost everyone is out having a social life or something (I hide from the world when there are likely to be drunk partiers?) but new episodes start in just a few days.

Pretty Little Liars is a show in the Twin Peaks and Veronica Mars in that the metaplot revolves around the disappearance/death of a pretty/popular girl, and features her friends looking into the mystery of what happens to her. All three also eventually reveal a secret sexual life that the girl led, that appears to be tied to her fate. Except PLL ditched all the men, focuses almost entirely on her relationships with other women, and is way less male gazey in general.

It’s also very like a Christopher Pike mystery book in that it’s cracky and twisty and has the hint of the supernatural, and focuses on a group of friends trying to solve the mystery. Except that it’s way, way less racist (Not that that’s hard, really-I’ve been rereading Pike lately, trust me on this-but I actually can’t think of any big failures that front?) has far fewer Nice Guys (and sometimes actually realizes that they are Nice Guys, and the girls involved should trade up) and all the detectives are girls.

So, basically, I’m wondering why more of the “multiple women doing things” fans on my list aren’t squeeing over it?

The basics are this: Spencer, Aria, Hanna and Emily used to be BFFs with Allison, the most popular girl in school, but then Allison disappeared while they were on a camping trip, and they grew apart, and have barely spoken since. But they re-bond when Allison’s body is found, and at her funeral, they all receive taunting texts from A, an unknown person who knows secrets that only Allison knew.

Then there’s the awesomely creepy blind girl who has just cause to hate their guts, the fact that their family lives are framed through their relationships with their mothers, and what is probably the only biracial lesbian pairing on television with no white people involved. (Also, they are adorable. So is some of the het, but especially them.)

There are romantic subplots at first that made me cringe a lot, but they mostly improve. I’m uncomfortable with some of it, but I think most of what makes me cringe is meant to. But basically, it’s a marvelously fun show about a bunch of snarky, bitchy girls having positive (and sometimes antagonistic, but mostly positive) relationships with each other and other women, solving mysteries and running through houses and woods in potential peril. Uhm…there are some boys, too? And I like some? But it’s mostly girls.

A couple random things before I get to some spoilers.

1. So, in a show about snarky, catty “mean” girls, my favorite is Hanna, the nicest and most considerate of the lot? I also just realized that every single other major character (except the token Nice Guy, who I ignore) has dark hair, and Hanna is the only blonde in the whole thing. Though, my next two favorites are Spencer (the ambitious control freak who reads a lot) and Jenna (the creepy snarky blind girl).

2. Speaking of hair, this show frequently suffers from Flat Hair Curse. You know, when all the women start with their own, individual hairstyles, but it slowly gets converted so that they all have the identical flat, straight hair? This first showed up with Jenna, which made me sad, but then Aria and Hanna were attacked by the curse, too. And the forced straightness really stands out next to more normally straight hair like Emily’s. I think the only thing saving Maya from the curse is that they don’t want us to notice that Bianca Lawson is still playing teenagers.

3. Yes, Kendra from Buffy is still playing a teenager. WTF? Also, Piper from Charmed plays Aria’s mother, and while Chad Lowe plays her father, wikipedia informs me that he was originally supposed to be played by Alexis Denisof. Piper and Wesley were going to have teenaged kids! But Kendra was (and is) still going to be a teenager! WHAT? My geekery is reeling.

Now for some spoilers.
spoileryness )


Soooo...has anyoneread the books?

Profile

meganbmoore: (Default)
meganbmoore

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 2728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 04:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios